| 1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
| 1.1. | Introduction to in-mold electronics (IME) |
| 1.2. | In-mold electronics applications (and prototypes) |
| 1.3. | IME manufacturing process flow |
| 1.4. | Comparing smart surface manufacturing methods |
| 1.5. | Commercial advantages of IME |
| 1.6. | IME facilitates versioning and localization |
| 1.7. | IME value chain - a development of in-mold decorating (IMD) |
| 1.8. | Reviewing the previous in-mold electronics report (2022-2032) |
| 1.9. | SWOT Analysis: IME-with-SMD |
| 1.10. | Tactotek announces multiple licensees and collaborations |
| 1.11. | Overview of IME manufacturing requirements |
| 1.12. | Overview of competing manufacturing methods |
| 1.13. | Distinguishing manufacturing methods for 3D electronics |
| 1.14. | Overview of specialist materials for IME |
| 1.15. | Overview of IME applications |
| 1.16. | Overview of IME and sustainability |
| 1.17. | Conclusions for the IME industry (I) |
| 1.18. | Conclusions for the IME industry (II) |
| 1.19. | 10-year forecast for IME-with-SMD component area by application (in m2) |
| 1.20. | 10-year forecast for IME-with-SMD revenue by application (in USD) |
| 1.21. | Forecast adoption proportion of manufacturing methodologies for automotive HMI surfaces |
| 2. | INTRODUCTION |
| 2.1. | Introduction to in-mold electronics (IME) |
| 2.2. | Transition from 2D to 2.5D to 3D electronics |
| 2.3. | Motivation for 3D/additive electronics |
| 2.4. | In-mold electronics applications (and prototypes) |
| 2.5. | Deciphering integrated/3D electronics terminology (I) |
| 2.6. | Deciphering integrated/3D electronics terminology (II) |
| 2.7. | Comparing smart surface manufacturing methods |
| 2.8. | Current status of main IME technology developer (TactoTek) |
| 2.9. | IME value chain overview |
| 2.10. | In-mold electronics with and without SMD components |
| 2.11. | The long road to IME commercialization |
| 2.12. | TactoTek's funding continues to increase |
| 2.13. | The functionality integration paradox |
| 2.14. | In-mold electronics lags functional film bonding in automotive adoption |
| 2.15. | When is functionality integration worthwhile? |
| 2.16. | Greater functionality integration should enhance value proposition (yields permitting) |
| 2.17. | Regional differences in IME development |
| 2.18. | IME players divided by location and value chain stage |
| 2.19. | Porters' analysis for in-mold electronics |
| 3. | MARKET FORECASTS |
| 3.1. | Forecast methodology |
| 3.2. | IME forecast adjustments relative to previous report |
| 3.3. | 10-year forecast for IME-with-SMD component area by application (in m2) |
| 3.4. | 10-year forecast for IME-with-SMD revenue by application (in USD) |
| 3.5. | 10-year forecasts for IME-without-SMD by application (area and volume) |
| 3.6. | 10-year forecasts functional foil bonding by application (area and volume) |
| 3.7. | Addressable market for IME: Automotive |
| 3.8. | Forecast adoption proportion of manufacturing methodologies for automotive HMI surfaces |
| 3.9. | 10-year forecast for HMI manufacturing methodology in automotive (area) |
| 3.10. | 10-year forecast for HMI manufacturing methodology in automotive (revenue) |
| 3.11. | Future (2033) IME market breakdown by application |
| 3.12. | IME value capture estimate at market maturity (2033) |
| 3.13. | Ten-year market forecasts for IME by value capture element (revenue, USD millions) |
| 3.14. | Value capture by functional ink type |
| 3.15. | 10-year market forecasts for functional inks in IME-with-SMD |
| 4. | MANUFACTURING METHODS |
| 4.1. | Introduction |
| 4.1.1. | Distinguishing manufacturing methods for 3D electronics |
| 4.2. | Manufacturing IME |
| 4.2.1. | Manufacturing IME components |
| 4.2.2. | IME manufacturing process flow (I) |
| 4.2.3. | IME manufacturing process flow (II) |
| 4.2.4. | IME manufacturing process flow (III) |
| 4.2.5. | Progression towards 3D electronics with IME |
| 4.2.6. | Manufacturing methods: Conventional electronics vs. IME |
| 4.2.7. | Alternative IME component architectures |
| 4.2.8. | Equipment required for IME production |
| 4.2.9. | Hybrid approach provides an intermediate route to market |
| 4.2.10. | Forecast progression in IME complexity |
| 4.2.11. | Surface mount device (SMD) attachment: Before or after forming |
| 4.2.12. | Component attachment cross-sections |
| 4.2.13. | One-film vs two-film approach |
| 4.2.14. | Multilayer IME circuits require cross-overs |
| 4.2.15. | IC package requirements for IME |
| 4.2.16. | IME requires special electronic design software |
| 4.2.17. | Faurecia concept: traditional vs. IME design |
| 4.2.18. | Conventional vs. IME comparison (Faurecia) |
| 4.2.19. | IME: value transfer from PCB board to ink |
| 4.2.20. | Print-then-plate for in-mold electronics |
| 4.2.21. | Automating IME manufacturing |
| 4.2.22. | Overview of IME manufacturing requirements |
| 4.3. | Similar manufacturing methodologies to IME |
| 4.3.1. | Multiple manufacturing methods similar to IME |
| 4.3.2. | Comparative advantage of in-mold electronic likely to increase over time |
| 4.3.3. | Applying functional foils (transfer printing) (I) |
| 4.3.4. | Applying functional films (evaporated lines) |
| 4.3.5. | Adding capacitive touch with films |
| 4.3.6. | Functional film bonding: an introduction |
| 4.3.7. | Applying functional films into 3D shaped parts (II) (PolyIC) |
| 4.4. | Other 3D metallization methods |
| 4.4.1. | Molded interconnect devices (MIDs) for 3D electronics |
| 4.4.2. | 3D electronics manufacturing method flowchart |
| 4.4.3. | Approaches to 3D printed electronics |
| 4.4.4. | Aerosol deposition of conductive inks onto 3D surfaces |
| 4.4.5. | Laser direct structuring (LDS) |
| 4.4.6. | Applications of LDS |
| 4.4.7. | LDS MID application examples: Automotive HMI |
| 4.4.8. | Extruding conductive paste for structurally-integrated antennas |
| 4.4.9. | Two shot molding - an alternative method for high volume MID devices |
| 4.4.10. | Printing electronics on 3D surfaces for automotive applications |
| 4.4.11. | Replacing wiring bundles with partially additive electronics |
| 4.4.12. | Application targets for printing wiring onto 3D surfaces |
| 4.4.13. | The promise of 3D printed electronics |
| 4.4.14. | Emerging approach: Multifunctional composites with electronics |
| 4.4.15. | Molding electronics in 3D shaped composites |
| 4.4.16. | Emerging approach: Electrical functionalization by additive manufacturing |
| 4.4.17. | Benchmarking competitive processes to 3D electronics |
| 4.4.18. | Overview of electronics on 3D surfaces |
| 5. | FUNCTIONALITY WITHIN IME COMPONENTS |
| 5.1. | Introduction |
| 5.1.1. | Integrating functionality within IME components |
| 5.2. | Capacitive touch sensing |
| 5.2.1. | Capacitive touch sensors overview |
| 5.2.2. | Capacitive sensors: Operating principle |
| 5.2.3. | Hybrid capacitive / piezoresistive sensors |
| 5.2.4. | Emerging current mode sensor readout: Principles |
| 5.2.5. | Benefits of current-mode capacitive sensor readout |
| 5.2.6. | SWOT analysis of capacitive touch sensors |
| 5.3. | Lighting |
| 5.3.1. | Motivation for integrating lighting with IME |
| 5.3.2. | Comparing conventional backlighting vs integrated lighting with IME (I) |
| 5.3.3. | Comparing conventional backlighting vs integrated lighting with IME (II) |
| 5.4. | Additional functionalities |
| 5.4.1. | Integration of haptic feedback |
| 5.4.2. | Thermoformed polymeric haptic actuator |
| 5.4.3. | Thermoformed 3D shaped reflective LCD display |
| 5.4.4. | Thermoformed 3D shaped RGD AMOLED with LTPS |
| 5.4.5. | Antenna integration with IME |
| 6. | MATERIALS FOR IME |
| 6.1. | Introduction |
| 6.1.1. | IME requires a wide range of specialist materials |
| 6.1.2. | Materials for IME: A portfolio approach |
| 6.1.3. | All materials in the stack must be compatible: Conductivity perspective |
| 6.1.4. | Material composition of IME vs conventional HMI components |
| 6.1.5. | Stability and durability is crucial |
| 6.1.6. | IME material suppliers |
| 6.2. | Conductive inks |
| 6.2.1. | Silver flake-based ink dominates IME |
| 6.2.2. | Comparing different conductive inks materials |
| 6.2.3. | Challenges of comparing conductive inks |
| 6.2.4. | Conductive ink requirements for in-mold electronics |
| 6.2.5. | Stretchable vs thermoformable conductive inks |
| 6.2.6. | In-mold electronics requires thermoformable conductive inks |
| 6.2.7. | Bridging the conductivity gap between printed electronics and IME inks |
| 6.2.8. | Gradual improvement over time in thermoformability |
| 6.2.9. | Thermoformable conductive inks from different resins |
| 6.2.10. | The role of particle size in thermoformable inks |
| 6.2.11. | Selecting right fillers and binders to improve stretchability (Elantas) |
| 6.2.12. | The role of resin in stretchable inks |
| 6.2.13. | All materials in the stack must be compatible: forming perspective |
| 6.2.14. | New ink requirements: Surviving heat stress |
| 6.2.15. | New ink requirements: Stability |
| 6.2.16. | Particle-free thermoformable inks (I) (E2IP/National Research Council of Canada) |
| 6.2.17. | Particle-free thermoformable inks (II) (E2IP/National Research Council of Canada) |
| 6.2.18. | In-mold conductive inks on the market |
| 6.2.19. | In-mold conductive ink examples |
| 6.2.20. | Polythiophene-based conductive films for flexible devices (Heraeus) |
| 6.3. | Dielectric inks |
| 6.3.1. | Dielectric inks for IME |
| 6.3.2. | Multilayer IME circuits require cross-overs |
| 6.3.3. | Cross-over dielectric: Requirements |
| 6.4. | Electrically conductive adhesives |
| 6.4.1. | Electrically conductive adhesives: General requirements and challenges for IME |
| 6.4.2. | Electrically conductive adhesives: Surviving the IME process |
| 6.4.3. | Specialist formable conductive adhesives required |
| 6.4.4. | Different types of conductive adhesives |
| 6.4.5. | Comparing ICAs and ACAs |
| 6.4.6. | Attaching components to low temperature substrates |
| 6.5. | Transparent conductive materials |
| 6.5.1. | Stretchable carbon nanotube transparent conducting films |
| 6.5.2. | Prototype examples of carbon nanotube in-mold transparent conductive films |
| 6.5.3. | 3D touch using carbon nanobuds |
| 6.5.4. | Prototype examples of in-mold and stretchable PEDOT:PSS transparent conductive films |
| 6.5.5. | In-mold and stretchable metal mesh transparent conductive films |
| 6.5.6. | Other in-mold transparent conductive film technologies |
| 6.6. | Substrates and thermoplastics |
| 6.6.1. | Substrates and thermoplastics for IME |
| 6.6.2. | Different molding materials and conditions |
| 6.6.3. | Special PET as alternative to common PC? |
| 6.6.4. | Can TPU also be a substrate? |
| 6.6.5. | Covestro: Plastics for IME |
| 7. | APPLICATIONS, COMMERCIALIZATION, AND PROTOTYPES |
| 7.1. | Introduction |
| 7.1.1. | IME interfaces break the cost/value compromise |
| 7.2. | Automotive |
| 7.2.1. | Motivation for IME in automotive applications |
| 7.2.2. | Opportunities for IME in automotive HMI |
| 7.2.3. | Addressable market in vehicle interiors in 2020 and 2025 |
| 7.2.4. | Automotive: In-mold decoration product examples |
| 7.2.5. | Early case study: Ford and T-ink |
| 7.2.6. | GEELY seat control: Development project not pursued |
| 7.2.7. | Capacitive touch panel with backlighting |
| 7.2.8. | Direct heating of headlamp plastic covers |
| 7.2.9. | Steering wheel with HMI (Canatu) |
| 7.2.10. | Quotes on the outlook for IME in automotive applications |
| 7.2.11. | Readiness level of printed/flexible electronics in vehicle interiors |
| 7.2.12. | Threat to automotive IME: Touch sensitive interior displays |
| 7.2.13. | Alternative to automotive IME: Integrated stretchable pressure sensors |
| 7.2.14. | Alternative to automotive IME: Integrated capacitive sensing |
| 7.3. | White goods |
| 7.3.1. | Opportunities for IME in white goods |
| 7.3.2. | Example prototypes of IME for white goods (I) |
| 7.3.3. | Example prototypes of IME for white goods (II) |
| 7.4. | Other applications |
| 7.4.1. | Other IME applications: Medical and industrial HMI |
| 7.4.2. | Home automation creates opportunities for IME |
| 7.4.3. | IME for home automation becomes commercial |
| 7.4.4. | Consumer electronics prototypes to products |
| 7.4.5. | Commercial products: wearable technology |
| 7.4.6. | Weight savings make IME compelling for aerospace applications |
| 8. | IME AND SUSTAINABILITY |
| 8.1. | IME and sustainability |
| 8.2. | IME reduces plastic consumption |
| 8.3. | VTT life cycle assessment of IME parts |
| 8.4. | IME vs reference component kg CO₂ equivalent (single IME panel): Cradle to gate |
| 8.5. | IME vs reference component kg CO₂ equivalent (100,000 IME panels): Cradle-to-grave |
| 8.6. | Summary of results from VTT's life cycle assessment |
| 9. | FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS FOR IME |
| 9.1. | IME with incorporated ICs |
| 9.2. | Laser induced forward transfer (LIFT) could replace screen printing |
| 9.3. | Thin film digital heaters for in-mold electronics thermoforming |
| 9.4. | S-shape copper traces facilitate stretchability without loss of conductivity |
| 10. | COMPANY PROFILES |
| 10.1. | ACI Materials |
| 10.2. | Advanced Decorative Systems |
| 10.3. | Butler Technologies |
| 10.4. | Canatu |
| 10.5. | Chasm |
| 10.6. | Clayens NP |
| 10.7. | Covestro |
| 10.8. | Dycotec |
| 10.9. | E2IP |
| 10.10. | Elantas |
| 10.11. | EptaNova |
| 10.12. | Faurecia |
| 10.13. | ForceIoT |
| 10.14. | GenesInk |
| 10.15. | Henkel |
| 10.16. | MacDermid Alpha |
| 10.17. | Nagase ChemteX |
| 10.18. | Niebling |
| 10.19. | Plastic Electronic |
| 10.20. | PolyIC |
| 10.21. | Sigma Sense |
| 10.22. | Sun Chemical |
| 10.23. | Symbiose |
| 10.24. | TactoTek |
| 10.25. | TG0 |