| 1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS | 
| 1.1. | Report Overview | 
| 1.2. | What is a PEM fuel cell? | 
| 1.3. | Major components for PEM fuel cells | 
| 1.4. | Applications for fuel cells and major players | 
| 1.5. | BPP: Purpose and form factor | 
| 1.6. | Materials for BPPs: Graphite vs metal | 
| 1.7. | BPP manufacturers flow chart | 
| 1.8. | GDL: Purpose and form factor | 
| 1.9. | GDL supply chain and key players | 
| 1.10. | Membrane: Purpose and form factor | 
| 1.11. | Market leaders for membrane materials | 
| 1.12. | Property benchmarking of membranes | 
| 1.13. | Ongoing Concerns with PFAS | 
| 1.14. | Outlook for Proton Exchange Membranes | 
| 1.15. | Catalyst: Purpose and form factor | 
| 1.16. | Trends for fuel cell catalysts | 
| 1.17. | Key suppliers of catalysts for fuel cells | 
| 1.18. | Balance of plant for PEM fuel cells | 
| 1.19. | Overview of market forecasts | 
| 1.20. | PEM fuel cell market for transport 2020-2034 | 
| 1.21. | Fuel cells within the FCEV market | 
| 2. | MARKET FORECASTS | 
| 2.1.1. | Forecast methodology and assumptions | 
| 2.1.2. | PEM Fuel Cell Demand for Transportation (MW) 2020-2034 | 
| 2.1.3. | PEM fuel cell market for transport 2020-2033 | 
| 2.2. | Market Forecasts - Bipolar Plates | 
| 2.2.1. | BPP demand by vehicle type 2020-2034 | 
| 2.2.2. | BPP demand by plate material 2020-2034 | 
| 2.2.3. | BPP material demand by plate material 2020-2034 | 
| 2.2.4. | BPP market value by plate material 2020-2034 | 
| 2.3. | Market Forecasts - Gas Diffusion Layer | 
| 2.3.1. | GDL demand forecast 2020-2034 | 
| 2.3.2. | GDL materials demand 2020-2034 | 
| 2.3.3. | GDL market value forecast 2020-2034 | 
| 2.4. | Market Forecasts - Membrane, Catalyst and CCM | 
| 2.4.1. | PEM demand forecast 2020-2034 | 
| 2.4.2. | PEM value forecast 2020-2034 | 
| 2.4.3. | Catalyst (PGM) demand forecast 2020-2034 | 
| 2.4.4. | CCM value forecast 2020-2034 | 
| 3. | INTRODUCTION | 
| 3.1. | Introduction to fuel cells | 
| 3.2. | What is a fuel cell? | 
| 3.3. | PEMFC working principle | 
| 3.4. | PEMFC assembly and materials | 
| 3.5. | Membrane assembly terminology | 
| 3.6. | Alternative fuel cell technologies | 
| 3.7. | High temperature PEMFC (1) | 
| 3.8. | High temperature PEMFC (2) | 
| 3.9. | Comparison of fuel cell technologies | 
| 3.10. | What is a fuel cell vehicle? | 
| 3.11. | Attraction of fuel cell vehicles | 
| 3.12. | Transport applications for fuel cells | 
| 3.13. | PEMFC market players | 
| 3.14. | China fuel cell installed capacity 2020 | 
| 3.15. | Other Chinese fuel cell system manufacturers | 
| 4. | FCEV MARKETS | 
| 4.1. | Fuel cell passenger cars | 
| 4.2. | System Efficiency Between BEVs and FCEVs | 
| 4.3. | Fuel Cell Car Models | 
| 4.4. | Toyota Mirai 2nd generation | 
| 4.5. | Hyundai NEXO | 
| 4.6. | Honda discontinue FC-Clarity: Weak demand | 
| 4.7. | Korea subsidy incentives: FCEV push but BEV far ahead | 
| 4.8. | Chinese FCEV Support | 
| 4.9. | Outlook for fuel cell cars | 
| 4.10. | Light commercial vehicles (LCVs) - Vans | 
| 4.11. | Fuel cell LCVs | 
| 4.12. | Outlook for fuel cell LCVs | 
| 4.13. | Truck Classifications | 
| 4.14. | Heavy-Duty Trucks: BEV or Fuel Cell? | 
| 4.15. | Outlook for fuel cell trucks | 
| 4.16. | Fuel cell buses | 
| 4.17. | Main advantages/disadvantages of fuel cell buses | 
| 4.18. | Outlook for fuel cell buses | 
| 4.19. | FCEV vs BEV Market Share in 2044 | 
| 5. | FC TRAIN MARKETS | 
| 5.1. | Overview of Train Types | 
| 5.2. | Drivers for Zero-emission Rail | 
| 5.3. | Fuel Cell Train Overview | 
| 5.4. | Range Advantage for Fuel Cell Trains | 
| 5.5. | Fuel Cell Technology Benchmarking for Rail | 
| 5.6. | Rail Fuel Cell Suppliers | 
| 5.7. | FC Multiple Unit Overview | 
| 5.8. | FC Locomotives Overview | 
| 5.9. | Outlook for Fuel Cell & Electric Trains | 
| 6. | FC SHIP MARKETS | 
| 6.1. | Marine Fuel Cells Introduction | 
| 6.2. | Fuel Cells Technologies for Ships | 
| 6.3. | Fuel Cell Suppliers: Leaders & Challengers | 
| 6.4. | Fuel Cell Supplier Market Share 2019-2024 | 
| 6.5. | Fuel Cell Deliveries by Vessel Type 2019-2024 | 
| 6.6. | Policy Drivers for Maritime Fuel Cells | 
| 6.7. | Outlook for Marine PEM Fuel Cells | 
| 7. | BIPOLAR PLATES | 
| 7.1.1. | Purpose of bipolar plate | 
| 7.1.2. | BPP form factor | 
| 7.1.3. | Effect of BPP form factor | 
| 7.1.4. | Bipolar plate assembly (BPA) | 
| 7.2. | Materials for BPPs | 
| 7.2.1. | Important material parameters to consider for BPPs | 
| 7.2.2. | Graphite as a BPP material | 
| 7.2.3. | Metal as a BPP material | 
| 7.2.4. | Cost progression of BPAs | 
| 7.2.5. | Coatings are required for metal BPPs | 
| 7.2.6. | Coating choices for metal BPPs | 
| 7.2.7. | Manufacturing methods for BPPs | 
| 7.2.8. | BPP manufacturers flow chart | 
| 7.3. | BPP manufacturers | 
| 7.3.1. | Overview of BPP Suppliers (non-exhaustive list) | 
| 7.3.2. | Case Study (NC Titanium): Kobe Steel | 
| 7.3.3. | Case Study (Dual Supply): Dana | 
| 7.3.4. | Case Study (Graphite): SGL Carbon | 
| 7.3.5. | Case Study (Graphite Composite): FJ Composite | 
| 7.3.6. | Case Study (System Supplier): Schuler | 
| 7.3.7. | Case Study (Laser Etch): SITEC | 
| 7.3.8. | Case Study (Chemical Etch): Precision Micro | 
| 7.3.9. | Comparison of graphite BPP suppliers | 
| 7.3.10. | Ranked comparison of graphite BPPs | 
| 7.4. | BPP coating specialists | 
| 7.4.1. | Impact Coating | 
| 7.4.2. | Precors | 
| 7.5. | Latest trends and research for BPPs | 
| 7.5.1. | Future directions for bipolar plate flow fields | 
| 7.5.2. | Printed Circuit Board BPPs - Bramble Energy | 
| 7.5.3. | Latest trends for BPPs | 
| 7.5.4. | Latest developments for BPPs: Loop Energy | 
| 7.5.5. | Latest developments for BPPs: CoBiP project | 
| 7.5.6. | Additional early-stage commercial developments for BPPs | 
| 7.5.7. | Latest academic research for BPPs | 
| 7.5.8. | Woven mesh for fuel cells | 
| 7.5.9. | Emerging manufacturing methods | 
| 8. | GAS DIFFUSION LAYER | 
| 8.1.1. | Role of the gas diffusion layer | 
| 8.1.2. | Hydrophobic coating for GDLs | 
| 8.1.3. | Wet vs dry GDL performance | 
| 8.1.4. | GDL manufacturing process | 
| 8.1.5. | Cellulosic fiber GDL: No MPL required | 
| 8.1.6. | Interactions between GDL & catalyst layer | 
| 8.1.7. | GDL latest research: Focus on dual hydrophobic and hydrophilic behaviour | 
| 8.2. | GDL Supply Chain and Players | 
| 8.2.1. | GDL supply chain | 
| 8.2.2. | GDL player: SGL Carbon | 
| 8.2.3. | GDL player: Toray | 
| 8.2.4. | GDL player: AvCarb | 
| 8.2.5. | GDL player: Freudenberg | 
| 8.2.6. | SGL Carbon - GDL market leader | 
| 8.2.7. | Outlook for Gas Diffusion Layers | 
| 9. | MEMBRANE | 
| 9.1.1. | Purpose of the membrane | 
| 9.1.2. | Form factor of the membrane | 
| 9.1.3. | Water management in the FC | 
| 9.2. | Incumbent membrane materials | 
| 9.2.1. | Proton exchange membrane overview | 
| 9.2.2. | Chemical structure of PFSA membranes | 
| 9.2.3. | Important material parameters to consider for the membrane | 
| 9.2.4. | Market leading membrane material: Nafion | 
| 9.2.5. | Competing membrane materials | 
| 9.2.6. | Property benchmarking of membranes | 
| 9.2.7. | Overview of PFSA membranes & key players | 
| 9.2.8. | Gore manufacture MEAs | 
| 9.2.9. | Membrane degradation processes overview | 
| 9.3. | Production of PFSA membranes | 
| 9.3.1. | PFSA membrane extrusion casting process | 
| 9.3.2. | PFSA membrane solution casting process | 
| 9.3.3. | PFSA membrane dispersion casting process | 
| 9.4. | Recent innovation of PFSA membranes | 
| 9.4.1. | Improvements to PFSA membranes | 
| 9.4.2. | Trade-offs in optimizing membrane performance | 
| 9.4.3. | Gore reinforced SELECT membranes | 
| 9.4.4. | Chemours reinforced Nafion membranes | 
| 9.5. | Concerns with PFAS (incl. PFSA) | 
| 9.5.1. | Introduction to PFAS | 
| 9.5.2. | What is the Concern? | 
| 9.5.3. | Where Are PFAS Used? | 
| 9.5.4. | Regulatory Outlook: EU | 
| 9.5.5. | Regulatory Outlook: USA | 
| 9.5.6. | Dutch Court Ruling on Environmental Damage Caused by PFAS Materials | 
| 9.5.7. | Comments from Market Leader (Chemours) | 
| 9.6. | Alternative (non-PFAS) membranes | 
| 9.6.1. | Hydrocarbons as PEM fuel cell membranes | 
| 9.6.2. | Assessment of hydrocarbon membranes | 
| 9.6.3. | Key player: Ionomr Innovations | 
| 9.6.4. | Benchmarking of Ionomr membrane against incumbent PFAS membrane | 
| 9.6.5. | Metal-organic frameworks | 
| 9.6.6. | Metal-organic frameworks for membranes: Academic research | 
| 9.6.7. | MOF composite membranes | 
| 9.6.8. | MOF composite membranes | 
| 9.6.9. | Graphene in the membrane | 
| 9.6.10. | Outlook for Proton Exchange Membranes | 
| 10. | CATALYSTS | 
| 10.1.1. | Platinum as a catalyst | 
| 10.1.2. | Catalyst coated membrane (CCM) | 
| 10.1.3. | Typical catalyst coated membrane (CCM) | 
| 10.1.4. | Influence of carbon black support on Pt/C | 
| 10.1.5. | Targets for reducing loading of catalytic materials in fuel cells | 
| 10.1.6. | Recycling of the catalyst | 
| 10.1.7. | Catalyst degradation mechanisms | 
| 10.1.8. | Overview of trends for catalysts | 
| 10.1.9. | Increasing catalytic activity - alternative metals | 
| 10.1.10. | Increasing catalytic activity - form factor | 
| 10.1.11. | SonoTek - Ultrasonic Deposition | 
| 10.1.12. | Mebius - Pt Skin over Catalyst Core | 
| 10.1.13. | Reduction of catalyst poisoning | 
| 10.1.14. | Reduction of cost of catalyst | 
| 10.1.15. | Future directions for catalysts | 
| 10.2. | Key Suppliers of Catalysts | 
| 10.2.1. | Leading catalyst suppliers: Cataler Corporation | 
| 10.2.2. | Leading catalyst suppliers: Umicore | 
| 10.2.3. | Leading catalyst suppliers: Johnson Matthey | 
| 10.2.4. | Leading catalyst suppliers: Tanaka, Heraeus and BASF | 
| 10.2.5. | Newly developed catalysts | 
| 11. | COMPANY PROFILES | 
| 11.1. | Related Profiles |