| 1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
| 1.1. | Key takeaways (1) |
| 1.2. | Key takeaways (2) |
| 1.3. | Major EV categories |
| 1.4. | Major EV categories |
| 1.5. | Future role for battery pack manufacturers |
| 1.6. | Remarks on battery manufacturers |
| 1.7. | Battery pack comparison |
| 1.8. | Turnkey battery pack performance comparison |
| 1.9. | Chemistry choices in turnkey EV packs |
| 1.10. | Turnkey battery design choices -cell form factor and cooling |
| 1.11. | Pack manufacturers |
| 1.12. | Trends in battery management systems |
| 1.13. | BMS patent landscape |
| 1.14. | BMS players |
| 1.15. | Innovations in BMS |
| 1.16. | Advanced BMS activity |
| 1.17. | BMS solutions for fast charging |
| 1.18. | Improvements to battery performance from BMS development |
| 1.19. | Regional BEV chemistry trends |
| 1.20. | EV cell supplier share |
| 1.21. | BEV cell form factors |
| 1.22. | BEV cell energy density trends |
| 1.23. | Development trends to LIB technology |
| 1.24. | Technology roadmap |
| 1.25. | Li-ion market demand shifts |
| 1.26. | BEV car pack price |
| 1.27. | EV Li-ion demand (GWh) |
| 1.28. | EV Li-ion battery market (US$B) |
| 2. | INTRODUCTION |
| 2.1. | Electric Vehicles: Basic Principle |
| 2.2. | Electric Vehicle Terms |
| 2.3. | Drivetrain Specifications |
| 2.4. | Parallel and Series Hybrids: Explained |
| 2.5. | What are the Barriers for Electric Vehicles? |
| 2.6. | What are the Barriers for Electric Vehicles? |
| 2.7. | Carbon emissions from electric vehicles |
| 2.8. | Policy and the Li-ion battery market |
| 2.9. | Electric vehicle policy |
| 2.10. | Impact of EV policy |
| 2.11. | Automaker EV Targets |
| 3. | LI-ION CELL TECHNOLOGY |
| 3.1. | Li-ion cells (cathodes, anodes, form factor, performance trends) |
| 3.1.1. | Importance of Li-ion |
| 3.1.2. | What is a Li-ion battery? |
| 3.1.3. | Lithium battery chemistries |
| 3.1.4. | Why lithium-ion? |
| 3.1.5. | Types of lithium battery |
| 3.1.6. | The Li-ion Supply Chain |
| 3.1.7. | Cell production capacity outlook |
| 3.1.8. | The Battery Trilemma |
| 3.1.9. | Battery wish list |
| 3.1.10. | Cathode comparisons - overview |
| 3.1.11. | Cathode performance comparison |
| 3.1.12. | Chemistry energy density comparison |
| 3.1.13. | Suitability of LFP for EVs |
| 3.1.14. | Impact of material price increases |
| 3.1.15. | Cathode prices |
| 3.1.16. | LFP in EVs |
| 3.1.17. | Anode comparisons - overview |
| 3.1.18. | Anode performance comparison |
| 3.1.19. | Anode share |
| 3.1.20. | Historic average cell price |
| 3.1.21. | How low can cell costs go? |
| 3.1.22. | How low can cell costs go? |
| 3.1.23. | Cell Types |
| 3.1.24. | Automotive format choices |
| 3.1.25. | Cell Format Market Share |
| 3.1.26. | Cell Format Comparison |
| 3.1.27. | Cell sizes |
| 3.1.28. | 4680 cylindrical cells |
| 3.1.29. | Comparing commercial cell chemistries |
| 3.1.30. | Commercial cell specifications |
| 3.1.31. | Commercial Li-ion cell performance |
| 3.1.32. | EV cell specifications |
| 3.1.33. | Increasing BEV battery cell specific energy |
| 3.1.34. | Increasing BEV battery cell energy density |
| 3.1.35. | Improvements to energy density |
| 3.1.36. | Timeline and outlook for Li-ion energy densities |
| 3.1.37. | Cycle life requirements for electric vehicles |
| 3.2. | Next-generation cell technology |
| 3.2.1. | How much can silicon improve energy density? |
| 3.2.2. | Current silicon use |
| 3.2.3. | Silicon use in EVs |
| 3.2.4. | Silicon and LFP |
| 3.2.5. | Partnerships and investors - solid-state and silicon |
| 3.2.6. | Automotive solid-state and silicon comparison |
| 3.2.7. | Notable players for solid-state EV battery technology |
| 3.2.8. | Notable players for silicon EV battery technology |
| 3.2.9. | Solid-state - Blue Solutions |
| 3.2.10. | Solid-state - Prologium |
| 3.2.11. | Pack considerations for SSBs |
| 3.2.12. | Silicon anodes - Enevate |
| 3.2.13. | Potential disruptors to conventional Li-ion |
| 3.2.14. | Cell chemistry comparison - quantitative |
| 3.2.15. | Concluding remarks |
| 3.2.16. | Value proposition of Na-ion batteries |
| 3.2.17. | Na-ion can offer cost competitive alternative to Li-ion |
| 3.2.18. | Na-ion to compliment Li-ion not replace |
| 4. | LI-ION BATTERY PACKS |
| 4.1. | Li-ion battery packs (cell-to-pack, 800V, bipolar) |
| 4.1.1. | Li-ion Batteries: from Cell to Pack |
| 4.1.2. | Shifts in Cell and Pack Design |
| 4.1.3. | Battery KPIs for EVs |
| 4.1.4. | Modular pack designs |
| 4.1.5. | Ultium BMS |
| 4.1.6. | What is Cell-to-pack? |
| 4.1.7. | Drivers and Challenges for Cell-to-pack |
| 4.1.8. | What is Cell-to-chassis/body? |
| 4.1.9. | BYD Blade battery |
| 4.1.10. | CATL Cell to Pack |
| 4.1.11. | CATL's CTP battery evolution |
| 4.1.12. | Cell-to-pack and Cell-to-body Designs Summary |
| 4.1.13. | Gravimetric Energy Density and Cell-to-pack Ratio |
| 4.1.14. | Volumetric Energy Density and Cell-to-pack Ratio |
| 4.1.15. | Cell-to-pack or modular? |
| 4.1.16. | Outlook for Cell-to-pack & Cell-to-body Designs |
| 4.1.17. | Bipolar batteries |
| 4.1.18. | Bipolar-enabled CTP |
| 4.1.19. | ProLogium: "MAB" EV battery pack assembly |
| 4.1.20. | EV battery pack assembly |
| 4.1.21. | Increasing BEV voltage |
| 4.1.22. | Drivers for 800V Platforms |
| 4.1.23. | Emerging 800V Platforms & SiC Inverters |
| 4.2. | Hybrid and dual-chemistry battery packs |
| 4.2.1. | Introduction to hybrid energy storage systems |
| 4.2.2. | Hybrid energy storage topologies |
| 4.2.3. | Electric vehicle hybrid battery packs |
| 4.2.4. | CATL hybrid Li-ion and Na-ion pack concept |
| 4.2.5. | CATL hybrid pack designs |
| 4.2.6. | Our Next Energy |
| 4.2.7. | High energy plus high cycle life |
| 4.2.8. | Nio's dual-chemistry battery |
| 4.2.9. | Dual chemistry battery for thermal performance |
| 4.2.10. | Nio hybrid battery operation |
| 4.2.11. | Fuel cell electric vehicles |
| 4.2.12. | Hybrid battery + supercapacitor |
| 4.2.13. | SWOT of dual-chemistry battery pack |
| 4.2.14. | Concluding remarks on dual-chemistry batteries |
| 4.3. | Pack materials |
| 4.3.1. | Battery Pack Materials |
| 4.3.2. | Battery Enclosure Materials and Competition |
| 4.3.3. | From Steel to Aluminium |
| 4.3.4. | Towards Composite Enclosures? |
| 4.3.5. | Composite Enclosure EV Examples (1) |
| 4.3.6. | Composite Enclosure EV Examples (2) |
| 4.3.7. | Projects for Composite Enclosure Development (1) |
| 4.3.8. | Projects for Composite Enclosure Development (2) |
| 4.3.9. | Battery Enclosure Materials Summary |
| 4.3.10. | Energy Density Improvements with Composites |
| 4.3.11. | Compression Pads/foams |
| 4.3.12. | Polyurethane Compression Pads |
| 4.3.13. | Players in Compression Pads/foams |
| 4.3.14. | Example use in EVs: Ford Mustang Mach-E |
| 4.4. | Thermal management |
| 4.4.1. | Stages of thermal runaway |
| 4.4.2. | Introduction to Thermal Interface Materials for EVs |
| 4.4.3. | TIM Pack and Module Overview |
| 4.4.4. | TIM Application - Pack and Modules |
| 4.4.5. | TIM Application by Cell Format |
| 4.4.6. | Key Properties for TIMs in EVs |
| 4.4.7. | Switching to Gap Fillers from Pads |
| 4.4.8. | Thermally Conductive Adhesives in EV Batteries |
| 4.4.9. | Material Options and Market Comparison |
| 4.4.10. | TIM Chemistry Comparison |
| 4.4.11. | Thermal Interface Material Trends |
| 4.4.12. | Gap Filler to Thermally Conductive Adhesives |
| 4.4.13. | Thermal System Architecture |
| 4.4.14. | Coolant Fluids in EVs |
| 4.4.15. | Introduction to EV Battery Thermal Management |
| 4.4.16. | Battery Thermal Management Strategy by OEM |
| 4.4.17. | Thermal Management in Cell-to-pack Designs |
| 4.4.18. | Inter-cell Heat Spreaders or Cooling Plates |
| 4.4.19. | Thermal Runaway and Fires in EVs |
| 4.4.20. | EV Fires: When Do They Happen? |
| 4.4.21. | Regulations |
| 4.4.22. | What are Fire Protection Materials? |
| 4.4.23. | Thermally Conductive or Thermally Insulating? |
| 4.4.24. | Fire Protection Materials: Main Categories |
| 4.4.25. | Material comparison |
| 5. | BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
| 5.1. | Battery management systems |
| 5.1.1. | Battery performance definitions |
| 5.1.2. | Trends in battery management systems |
| 5.1.3. | BMS introduction |
| 5.1.4. | Introduction to battery management systems |
| 5.1.5. | BMS core functionality |
| 5.1.6. | Functions of a BMS |
| 5.1.7. | Cell control |
| 5.1.8. | BMS core hardware |
| 5.1.9. | BMS structure |
| 5.1.10. | Block diagram of BMS - generic |
| 5.1.11. | BMS topologies |
| 5.1.12. | BMS topologies |
| 5.1.13. | BMS topology evaluation |
| 5.1.14. | State estimation |
| 5.1.15. | SoC estimation |
| 5.1.16. | SoC estimation |
| 5.1.17. | SoC and SoH estimation methods |
| 5.1.18. | State of Health (SoH) |
| 5.1.19. | Improving state estimation |
| 5.1.20. | Remaining Useful Life (RUL) |
| 5.1.21. | Remaining Useful Life (RUL) |
| 5.1.22. | Remaining Useful Life (RUL) estimation |
| 5.1.23. | Data-driven approaches to RUL estimation |
| 5.1.24. | Flowcharts for determining RUL |
| 5.1.25. | Flowcharts for determining RUL via machine-learning (ML) |
| 5.1.26. | Consequences of cell imbalance |
| 5.1.27. | Cell balancing |
| 5.1.28. | Fast charging limitations |
| 5.1.29. | Impact of fast-charging |
| 5.1.30. | Fast charging protocols |
| 5.1.31. | Electric car charging profiles |
| 5.1.32. | BMS solutions for fast charging |
| 5.1.33. | Cloud analytics and SaaS |
| 5.1.34. | Key patent classifications |
| 5.1.35. | BMS patent landscape topics |
| 5.1.36. | BMS patent landscape |
| 5.1.37. | BMS patent assignees |
| 5.1.38. | BMS patent landscape regional activity |
| 5.1.39. | Innovations in BMS |
| 5.1.40. | Improvements from BMS development |
| 5.2. | BMS players |
| 5.2.1. | BMS activity |
| 5.2.2. | BMS companies |
| 5.2.3. | BMS companies |
| 5.2.4. | BMS players |
| 5.2.5. | Advanced BMS activity |
| 5.2.6. | Advanced BMS players |
| 5.2.7. | Lithium Balance |
| 5.2.8. | Qnovo |
| 5.2.9. | Qnovo |
| 5.2.10. | Breathe Battery Technologies |
| 5.2.11. | GBatteries |
| 5.2.12. | Iontra |
| 5.2.13. | Iontra technology |
| 5.2.14. | Eatron Technologies |
| 5.2.15. | Eatron RUL estimation |
| 5.2.16. | Titan AES |
| 5.2.17. | Brill Power |
| 5.2.18. | Relectrify |
| 5.2.19. | Nerve Smart Systems |
| 5.3. | Wireless BMS |
| 5.3.1. | Introduction to wireless BMS |
| 5.3.2. | Development of wireless BMS |
| 5.3.3. | Analog Devices wBMS |
| 5.3.4. | Texas Instruments wBMS |
| 5.3.5. | Wireless BMS hardware |
| 5.3.6. | Dukosi |
| 5.3.7. | Wireless BMS patent example |
| 5.3.8. | Wireless BMS players |
| 5.3.9. | Wireless BMS pros and cons |
| 5.4. | Battery management system semiconductors and ICs |
| 5.4.1. | BMS semiconductor introduction |
| 5.4.2. | Block diagram of BMS - NXP |
| 5.4.3. | Block diagram of BMS - ST Micro |
| 5.4.4. | Block diagram of BMS - Infineon |
| 5.4.5. | Example monitoring and balancing IC |
| 5.4.6. | Example microcontroller |
| 5.4.7. | Microcontroller technology |
| 5.4.8. | MCU - product table |
| 5.4.9. | Monitoring and balancing IC |
| 5.4.10. | BMS innovation |
| 6. | PACK MANUFACTURERS - COMMERCIAL VEHICLES |
| 6.1. | Developments in pack manufacturers |
| 6.2. | Acquisitions of pack manufacturers |
| 6.3. | Module and pack manufacturing process |
| 6.4. | Module and pack manufacturing |
| 6.5. | Non-car battery pack manufacturing |
| 6.6. | Differences in design |
| 6.7. | Differences in pack design |
| 6.8. | Role of battery pack manufacturers |
| 6.9. | Metrics to compare pack manufacturers |
| 6.10. | Battery pack manufacturers - Europe |
| 6.11. | Battery pack manufacturers |
| 6.12. | Battery pack manufacturers - North America |
| 6.13. | Battery pack manufacturers |
| 6.14. | Asian module and pack manufacturers |
| 6.15. | Battery pack comparison |
| 6.16. | Battery module/pack comparison |
| 6.17. | Battery pack performance comparison |
| 6.18. | Battery pack/module comparison |
| 6.19. | Battery pack/module comparison |
| 6.20. | Turnkey battery design choices -cell form factor and cooling |
| 6.21. | Energy density comparison by form factor |
| 6.22. | Energy density comparison by cooling method |
| 6.23. | Chemistry choices in turnkey EV packs |
| 6.24. | Truck battery chemistry examples |
| 6.25. | Cycle life requirements |
| 6.26. | Chemistry and form factors of turnkey solutions |
| 6.27. | Pack manufacturer revenue estimates |
| 6.28. | Microvast |
| 6.29. | Microvast |
| 6.30. | Forsee Power |
| 6.31. | Forsee Power batteries |
| 6.32. | Xerotech |
| 6.33. | Borg Warner battery packs |
| 6.34. | Webasto |
| 6.35. | BMZ |
| 6.36. | Kore Power |
| 6.37. | Proterra |
| 6.38. | Electrovaya |
| 6.39. | American Battery Solutions |
| 6.40. | Leclanche |
| 6.41. | WAE Technologies |
| 6.42. | Future role for battery pack manufacturers |
| 6.43. | Concluding remarks on battery manufacturers |
| 7. | SECTORS AND EV SEGMENTS |
| 7.1. | Introduction |
| 7.1.1. | Major EV categories |
| 7.1.2. | Major EV categories |
| 7.1.3. | Application battery priorities |
| 7.2. | BEVs |
| 7.2.1. | Electric cars |
| 7.2.2. | Global BEV chemistry trends |
| 7.2.3. | Regional BEV chemistry trends |
| 7.2.4. | EV cell supplier share |
| 7.2.5. | EV cell supplier share |
| 7.2.6. | BEV cell form factors |
| 7.2.7. | Cell form factor trends by region |
| 7.2.8. | BEV cell energy density trends |
| 7.2.9. | BEV pack energy density trends |
| 7.2.10. | BEV energy density trends by region |
| 7.2.11. | Electric car battery size trend |
| 7.2.12. | Hybrid electric vehicles |
| 7.3. | Electric buses, vans and trucks |
| 7.3.1. | Other Vehicle Categories |
| 7.3.2. | Cycle life requirements for commercial electric vehicles |
| 7.3.3. | Electric medium and heavy duty trucks |
| 7.3.4. | Electric light commercial vehicles |
| 7.3.5. | Drivers and timing of bus electrification |
| 7.3.6. | Electric Buses: Market History |
| 7.3.7. | Chemistries used in electric buses |
| 7.3.8. | China eBus Battery Market |
| 7.3.9. | Chinese Battery Manufacturers for eBuses |
| 7.3.10. | The Rise of Zero Emission Trucks |
| 7.3.11. | CO2 Emission: Medium & Heavy-Duty Trucks |
| 7.3.12. | Fuel / CO2 Regulation for New Trucks |
| 7.3.13. | Fuel Saving Technology Areas |
| 7.3.14. | Zero Emission Trucks: Drivers and Barriers |
| 7.3.15. | Installed Battery Capacity by Truck Weight |
| 7.3.16. | E-Truck OEM Battery Chemistry Choice |
| 7.3.17. | Heavy-Duty Battery Choice: Range & Payload |
| 7.3.18. | Battery Chemistry Tailored to Duty Requirement |
| 7.3.19. | The EV revolution is happening on two wheels |
| 7.3.20. | China and India are major three-wheeler markets |
| 7.3.21. | Policies supporting two and three-wheelers |
| 7.3.22. | Electrification is occurring faster in the three-wheeler markets |
| 7.3.23. | Micro EV types |
| 7.3.24. | European two-wheeler classification |
| 7.3.25. | Micro EV characteristics |
| 7.3.26. | Battery chemistry choices |
| 7.3.27. | Lead-acid vs lithium-ion |
| 7.3.28. | Battery cost of two-wheelers in China |
| 7.3.29. | Lithium-ion two-wheelers on the rise |
| 7.4. | Electric off-road (construction, material handling, marine) |
| 7.4.1. | Drivers for Construction Vehicle Electrification |
| 7.4.2. | Advantages of / Barriers to Machine Electrification |
| 7.4.3. | Performance Advantages of an Electric Excavator |
| 7.4.4. | Battery Sizes for Different Vehicle Types |
| 7.4.5. | Options for Meeting Power Duty Cycle Power Demand |
| 7.4.6. | Chinese OEMs Large Battery Excavators |
| 7.4.7. | Battery Requirements in Construction: Performance |
| 7.4.8. | Construction Equipment Electrification Opportunities (1) |
| 7.4.9. | Construction Equipment Electrification Opportunities (2) |
| 7.4.10. | Known construction & battery supplier relationships (1) |
| 7.4.11. | Known construction & battery supplier relationships (2) |
| 7.4.12. | Key performance indicators for train battery systems |
| 7.4.13. | Battery Chemistry Benchmarking for Trains |
| 7.4.14. | Operational Energy Demand for Battery Sizing |
| 7.4.15. | Battery System Suppliers to Rail OEMs |
| 7.4.16. | Toshiba LTO Battery Rail Projects & Market |
| 7.4.17. | Forsee Power Target Light Rail Applications |
| 7.4.18. | Rail Battery System Prices by Chemistry US$/kWh |
| 7.4.19. | Intralogistics shifting to Li-ion |
| 7.4.20. | Intralogistics Li-ion partnerships |
| 7.4.21. | Li-ion intralogistics chemistries |
| 7.4.22. | Summary of market drivers for electric & hybrid marine |
| 7.4.23. | Overview of policy for maritime batteries |
| 7.4.24. | Shifting Emission Policy Focus |
| 7.4.25. | The importance of batteries in hybrid systems |
| 7.4.26. | Why marine batteries are unique |
| 7.4.27. | Marine systems: stacks & strings scaling to MWh |
| 7.4.28. | Marine battery system specs |
| 7.4.29. | Battery chemistries for marine applications |
| 8. | FORECASTS |
| 8.1. | Electric car Li-ion demand forecast (GWh) |
| 8.2. | Electric bus, truck and van battery forecast (GWh) |
| 8.3. | Micro EV Li-ion demand forecast (GWh) |
| 8.4. | Global electric vehicle Li-ion demand (GWh) |
| 8.5. | Li-ion forecast by cathode (GWh) |
| 8.6. | Cell price forecast |
| 8.7. | BEV car pack price |
| 8.8. | Electric car Li-ion battery market forecast (US$B) |
| 8.9. | On-road EV Li-ion battery market (US$B) |
| 8.10. | EV Li-ion battery market (US$B) |
| 8.11. | EV Li-ion battery market (US$B) |