| 1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | 
| 1.1. | Key takeaways (1) | 
| 1.2. | Key takeaways (2) | 
| 1.3. | Major EV categories | 
| 1.4. | Major EV categories | 
| 1.5. | Future role for battery pack manufacturers | 
| 1.6. | Remarks on battery manufacturers | 
| 1.7. | Battery pack comparison | 
| 1.8. | Turnkey battery pack performance comparison | 
| 1.9. | Chemistry choices in turnkey EV packs | 
| 1.10. | Turnkey battery design choices -cell form factor and cooling | 
| 1.11. | Pack manufacturers | 
| 1.12. | Trends in battery management systems | 
| 1.13. | BMS patent landscape | 
| 1.14. | BMS players | 
| 1.15. | Innovations in BMS | 
| 1.16. | Advanced BMS activity | 
| 1.17. | BMS solutions for fast charging | 
| 1.18. | Improvements to battery performance from BMS development | 
| 1.19. | Regional BEV chemistry trends | 
| 1.20. | EV cell supplier share | 
| 1.21. | BEV cell form factors | 
| 1.22. | BEV cell energy density trends | 
| 1.23. | Development trends to LIB technology | 
| 1.24. | Technology roadmap | 
| 1.25. | Li-ion market demand shifts | 
| 1.26. | BEV car pack price | 
| 1.27. | EV Li-ion demand (GWh) | 
| 1.28. | EV Li-ion battery market (US$B) | 
| 2. | INTRODUCTION | 
| 2.1. | Electric Vehicles: Basic Principle | 
| 2.2. | Electric Vehicle Terms | 
| 2.3. | Drivetrain Specifications | 
| 2.4. | Parallel and Series Hybrids: Explained | 
| 2.5. | What are the Barriers for Electric Vehicles? | 
| 2.6. | What are the Barriers for Electric Vehicles? | 
| 2.7. | Carbon emissions from electric vehicles | 
| 2.8. | Policy and the Li-ion battery market | 
| 2.9. | Electric vehicle policy | 
| 2.10. | Impact of EV policy | 
| 2.11. | Automaker EV Targets | 
| 3. | LI-ION CELL TECHNOLOGY | 
| 3.1. | Li-ion cells (cathodes, anodes, form factor, performance trends) | 
| 3.1.1. | Importance of Li-ion | 
| 3.1.2. | What is a Li-ion battery? | 
| 3.1.3. | Lithium battery chemistries | 
| 3.1.4. | Why lithium-ion? | 
| 3.1.5. | Types of lithium battery | 
| 3.1.6. | The Li-ion Supply Chain | 
| 3.1.7. | Cell production capacity outlook | 
| 3.1.8. | The Battery Trilemma | 
| 3.1.9. | Battery wish list | 
| 3.1.10. | Cathode comparisons - overview | 
| 3.1.11. | Cathode performance comparison | 
| 3.1.12. | Chemistry energy density comparison | 
| 3.1.13. | Suitability of LFP for EVs | 
| 3.1.14. | Impact of material price increases | 
| 3.1.15. | Cathode prices | 
| 3.1.16. | LFP in EVs | 
| 3.1.17. | Anode comparisons - overview | 
| 3.1.18. | Anode performance comparison | 
| 3.1.19. | Anode share | 
| 3.1.20. | Historic average cell price | 
| 3.1.21. | How low can cell costs go? | 
| 3.1.22. | How low can cell costs go? | 
| 3.1.23. | Cell Types | 
| 3.1.24. | Automotive format choices | 
| 3.1.25. | Cell Format Market Share | 
| 3.1.26. | Cell Format Comparison | 
| 3.1.27. | Cell sizes | 
| 3.1.28. | 4680 cylindrical cells | 
| 3.1.29. | Comparing commercial cell chemistries | 
| 3.1.30. | Commercial cell specifications | 
| 3.1.31. | Commercial Li-ion cell performance | 
| 3.1.32. | EV cell specifications | 
| 3.1.33. | Increasing BEV battery cell specific energy | 
| 3.1.34. | Increasing BEV battery cell energy density | 
| 3.1.35. | Improvements to energy density | 
| 3.1.36. | Timeline and outlook for Li-ion energy densities | 
| 3.1.37. | Cycle life requirements for electric vehicles | 
| 3.2. | Next-generation cell technology | 
| 3.2.1. | How much can silicon improve energy density? | 
| 3.2.2. | Current silicon use | 
| 3.2.3. | Silicon use in EVs | 
| 3.2.4. | Silicon and LFP | 
| 3.2.5. | Partnerships and investors - solid-state and silicon | 
| 3.2.6. | Automotive solid-state and silicon comparison | 
| 3.2.7. | Notable players for solid-state EV battery technology | 
| 3.2.8. | Notable players for silicon EV battery technology | 
| 3.2.9. | Solid-state - Blue Solutions | 
| 3.2.10. | Solid-state - Prologium | 
| 3.2.11. | Pack considerations for SSBs | 
| 3.2.12. | Silicon anodes - Enevate | 
| 3.2.13. | Potential disruptors to conventional Li-ion | 
| 3.2.14. | Cell chemistry comparison - quantitative | 
| 3.2.15. | Concluding remarks | 
| 3.2.16. | Value proposition of Na-ion batteries | 
| 3.2.17. | Na-ion can offer cost competitive alternative to Li-ion | 
| 3.2.18. | Na-ion to compliment Li-ion not replace | 
| 4. | LI-ION BATTERY PACKS | 
| 4.1. | Li-ion battery packs (cell-to-pack, 800V, bipolar) | 
| 4.1.1. | Li-ion Batteries: from Cell to Pack | 
| 4.1.2. | Shifts in Cell and Pack Design | 
| 4.1.3. | Battery KPIs for EVs | 
| 4.1.4. | Modular pack designs | 
| 4.1.5. | Ultium BMS | 
| 4.1.6. | What is Cell-to-pack? | 
| 4.1.7. | Drivers and Challenges for Cell-to-pack | 
| 4.1.8. | What is Cell-to-chassis/body? | 
| 4.1.9. | BYD Blade battery | 
| 4.1.10. | CATL Cell to Pack | 
| 4.1.11. | CATL's CTP battery evolution | 
| 4.1.12. | Cell-to-pack and Cell-to-body Designs Summary | 
| 4.1.13. | Gravimetric Energy Density and Cell-to-pack Ratio | 
| 4.1.14. | Volumetric Energy Density and Cell-to-pack Ratio | 
| 4.1.15. | Cell-to-pack or modular? | 
| 4.1.16. | Outlook for Cell-to-pack & Cell-to-body Designs | 
| 4.1.17. | Bipolar batteries | 
| 4.1.18. | Bipolar-enabled CTP | 
| 4.1.19. | ProLogium: "MAB" EV battery pack assembly | 
| 4.1.20. | EV battery pack assembly | 
| 4.1.21. | Increasing BEV voltage | 
| 4.1.22. | Drivers for 800V Platforms | 
| 4.1.23. | Emerging 800V Platforms & SiC Inverters | 
| 4.2. | Hybrid and dual-chemistry battery packs | 
| 4.2.1. | Introduction to hybrid energy storage systems | 
| 4.2.2. | Hybrid energy storage topologies | 
| 4.2.3. | Electric vehicle hybrid battery packs | 
| 4.2.4. | CATL hybrid Li-ion and Na-ion pack concept | 
| 4.2.5. | CATL hybrid pack designs | 
| 4.2.6. | Our Next Energy | 
| 4.2.7. | High energy plus high cycle life | 
| 4.2.8. | Nio's dual-chemistry battery | 
| 4.2.9. | Dual chemistry battery for thermal performance | 
| 4.2.10. | Nio hybrid battery operation | 
| 4.2.11. | Fuel cell electric vehicles | 
| 4.2.12. | Hybrid battery + supercapacitor | 
| 4.2.13. | SWOT of dual-chemistry battery pack | 
| 4.2.14. | Concluding remarks on dual-chemistry batteries | 
| 4.3. | Pack materials | 
| 4.3.1. | Battery Pack Materials | 
| 4.3.2. | Battery Enclosure Materials and Competition | 
| 4.3.3. | From Steel to Aluminium | 
| 4.3.4. | Towards Composite Enclosures? | 
| 4.3.5. | Composite Enclosure EV Examples (1) | 
| 4.3.6. | Composite Enclosure EV Examples (2) | 
| 4.3.7. | Projects for Composite Enclosure Development (1) | 
| 4.3.8. | Projects for Composite Enclosure Development (2) | 
| 4.3.9. | Battery Enclosure Materials Summary | 
| 4.3.10. | Energy Density Improvements with Composites | 
| 4.3.11. | Compression Pads/foams | 
| 4.3.12. | Polyurethane Compression Pads | 
| 4.3.13. | Players in Compression Pads/foams | 
| 4.3.14. | Example use in EVs: Ford Mustang Mach-E | 
| 4.4. | Thermal management | 
| 4.4.1. | Stages of thermal runaway | 
| 4.4.2. | Introduction to Thermal Interface Materials for EVs | 
| 4.4.3. | TIM Pack and Module Overview | 
| 4.4.4. | TIM Application - Pack and Modules | 
| 4.4.5. | TIM Application by Cell Format | 
| 4.4.6. | Key Properties for TIMs in EVs | 
| 4.4.7. | Switching to Gap Fillers from Pads | 
| 4.4.8. | Thermally Conductive Adhesives in EV Batteries | 
| 4.4.9. | Material Options and Market Comparison | 
| 4.4.10. | TIM Chemistry Comparison | 
| 4.4.11. | Thermal Interface Material Trends | 
| 4.4.12. | Gap Filler to Thermally Conductive Adhesives | 
| 4.4.13. | Thermal System Architecture | 
| 4.4.14. | Coolant Fluids in EVs | 
| 4.4.15. | Introduction to EV Battery Thermal Management | 
| 4.4.16. | Battery Thermal Management Strategy by OEM | 
| 4.4.17. | Thermal Management in Cell-to-pack Designs | 
| 4.4.18. | Inter-cell Heat Spreaders or Cooling Plates | 
| 4.4.19. | Thermal Runaway and Fires in EVs | 
| 4.4.20. | EV Fires: When Do They Happen? | 
| 4.4.21. | Regulations | 
| 4.4.22. | What are Fire Protection Materials? | 
| 4.4.23. | Thermally Conductive or Thermally Insulating? | 
| 4.4.24. | Fire Protection Materials: Main Categories | 
| 4.4.25. | Material comparison | 
| 5. | BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS | 
| 5.1. | Battery management systems | 
| 5.1.1. | Battery performance definitions | 
| 5.1.2. | Trends in battery management systems | 
| 5.1.3. | BMS introduction | 
| 5.1.4. | Introduction to battery management systems | 
| 5.1.5. | BMS core functionality | 
| 5.1.6. | Functions of a BMS | 
| 5.1.7. | Cell control | 
| 5.1.8. | BMS core hardware | 
| 5.1.9. | BMS structure | 
| 5.1.10. | Block diagram of BMS - generic | 
| 5.1.11. | BMS topologies | 
| 5.1.12. | BMS topologies | 
| 5.1.13. | BMS topology evaluation | 
| 5.1.14. | State estimation | 
| 5.1.15. | SoC estimation | 
| 5.1.16. | SoC estimation | 
| 5.1.17. | SoC and SoH estimation methods | 
| 5.1.18. | State of Health (SoH) | 
| 5.1.19. | Improving state estimation | 
| 5.1.20. | Remaining Useful Life (RUL) | 
| 5.1.21. | Remaining Useful Life (RUL) | 
| 5.1.22. | Remaining Useful Life (RUL) estimation | 
| 5.1.23. | Data-driven approaches to RUL estimation | 
| 5.1.24. | Flowcharts for determining RUL | 
| 5.1.25. | Flowcharts for determining RUL via machine-learning (ML) | 
| 5.1.26. | Consequences of cell imbalance | 
| 5.1.27. | Cell balancing | 
| 5.1.28. | Fast charging limitations | 
| 5.1.29. | Impact of fast-charging | 
| 5.1.30. | Fast charging protocols | 
| 5.1.31. | Electric car charging profiles | 
| 5.1.32. | BMS solutions for fast charging | 
| 5.1.33. | Cloud analytics and SaaS | 
| 5.1.34. | Key patent classifications | 
| 5.1.35. | BMS patent landscape topics | 
| 5.1.36. | BMS patent landscape | 
| 5.1.37. | BMS patent assignees | 
| 5.1.38. | BMS patent landscape regional activity | 
| 5.1.39. | Innovations in BMS | 
| 5.1.40. | Improvements from BMS development | 
| 5.2. | BMS players | 
| 5.2.1. | BMS activity | 
| 5.2.2. | BMS companies | 
| 5.2.3. | BMS companies | 
| 5.2.4. | BMS players | 
| 5.2.5. | Advanced BMS activity | 
| 5.2.6. | Advanced BMS players | 
| 5.2.7. | Lithium Balance | 
| 5.2.8. | Qnovo | 
| 5.2.9. | Qnovo | 
| 5.2.10. | Breathe Battery Technologies | 
| 5.2.11. | GBatteries | 
| 5.2.12. | Iontra | 
| 5.2.13. | Iontra technology | 
| 5.2.14. | Eatron Technologies | 
| 5.2.15. | Eatron RUL estimation | 
| 5.2.16. | Titan AES | 
| 5.2.17. | Brill Power | 
| 5.2.18. | Relectrify | 
| 5.2.19. | Nerve Smart Systems | 
| 5.3. | Wireless BMS | 
| 5.3.1. | Introduction to wireless BMS | 
| 5.3.2. | Development of wireless BMS | 
| 5.3.3. | Analog Devices wBMS | 
| 5.3.4. | Texas Instruments wBMS | 
| 5.3.5. | Wireless BMS hardware | 
| 5.3.6. | Dukosi | 
| 5.3.7. | Wireless BMS patent example | 
| 5.3.8. | Wireless BMS players | 
| 5.3.9. | Wireless BMS pros and cons | 
| 5.4. | Battery management system semiconductors and ICs | 
| 5.4.1. | BMS semiconductor introduction | 
| 5.4.2. | Block diagram of BMS - NXP | 
| 5.4.3. | Block diagram of BMS - ST Micro | 
| 5.4.4. | Block diagram of BMS - Infineon | 
| 5.4.5. | Example monitoring and balancing IC | 
| 5.4.6. | Example microcontroller | 
| 5.4.7. | Microcontroller technology | 
| 5.4.8. | MCU - product table | 
| 5.4.9. | Monitoring and balancing IC | 
| 5.4.10. | BMS innovation | 
| 6. | PACK MANUFACTURERS - COMMERCIAL VEHICLES | 
| 6.1. | Developments in pack manufacturers | 
| 6.2. | Acquisitions of pack manufacturers | 
| 6.3. | Module and pack manufacturing process | 
| 6.4. | Module and pack manufacturing | 
| 6.5. | Non-car battery pack manufacturing | 
| 6.6. | Differences in design | 
| 6.7. | Differences in pack design | 
| 6.8. | Role of battery pack manufacturers | 
| 6.9. | Metrics to compare pack manufacturers | 
| 6.10. | Battery pack manufacturers - Europe | 
| 6.11. | Battery pack manufacturers | 
| 6.12. | Battery pack manufacturers - North America | 
| 6.13. | Battery pack manufacturers | 
| 6.14. | Asian module and pack manufacturers | 
| 6.15. | Battery pack comparison | 
| 6.16. | Battery module/pack comparison | 
| 6.17. | Battery pack performance comparison | 
| 6.18. | Battery pack/module comparison | 
| 6.19. | Battery pack/module comparison | 
| 6.20. | Turnkey battery design choices -cell form factor and cooling | 
| 6.21. | Energy density comparison by form factor | 
| 6.22. | Energy density comparison by cooling method | 
| 6.23. | Chemistry choices in turnkey EV packs | 
| 6.24. | Truck battery chemistry examples | 
| 6.25. | Cycle life requirements | 
| 6.26. | Chemistry and form factors of turnkey solutions | 
| 6.27. | Pack manufacturer revenue estimates | 
| 6.28. | Microvast | 
| 6.29. | Microvast | 
| 6.30. | Forsee Power | 
| 6.31. | Forsee Power batteries | 
| 6.32. | Xerotech | 
| 6.33. | Borg Warner battery packs | 
| 6.34. | Webasto | 
| 6.35. | BMZ | 
| 6.36. | Kore Power | 
| 6.37. | Proterra | 
| 6.38. | Electrovaya | 
| 6.39. | American Battery Solutions | 
| 6.40. | Leclanche | 
| 6.41. | WAE Technologies | 
| 6.42. | Future role for battery pack manufacturers | 
| 6.43. | Concluding remarks on battery manufacturers | 
| 7. | SECTORS AND EV SEGMENTS | 
| 7.1. | Introduction | 
| 7.1.1. | Major EV categories | 
| 7.1.2. | Major EV categories | 
| 7.1.3. | Application battery priorities | 
| 7.2. | BEVs | 
| 7.2.1. | Electric cars | 
| 7.2.2. | Global BEV chemistry trends | 
| 7.2.3. | Regional BEV chemistry trends | 
| 7.2.4. | EV cell supplier share | 
| 7.2.5. | EV cell supplier share | 
| 7.2.6. | BEV cell form factors | 
| 7.2.7. | Cell form factor trends by region | 
| 7.2.8. | BEV cell energy density trends | 
| 7.2.9. | BEV pack energy density trends | 
| 7.2.10. | BEV energy density trends by region | 
| 7.2.11. | Electric car battery size trend | 
| 7.2.12. | Hybrid electric vehicles | 
| 7.3. | Electric buses, vans and trucks | 
| 7.3.1. | Other Vehicle Categories | 
| 7.3.2. | Cycle life requirements for commercial electric vehicles | 
| 7.3.3. | Electric medium and heavy duty trucks | 
| 7.3.4. | Electric light commercial vehicles | 
| 7.3.5. | Drivers and timing of bus electrification | 
| 7.3.6. | Electric Buses: Market History | 
| 7.3.7. | Chemistries used in electric buses | 
| 7.3.8. | China eBus Battery Market | 
| 7.3.9. | Chinese Battery Manufacturers for eBuses | 
| 7.3.10. | The Rise of Zero Emission Trucks | 
| 7.3.11. | CO2 Emission: Medium & Heavy-Duty Trucks | 
| 7.3.12. | Fuel / CO2 Regulation for New Trucks | 
| 7.3.13. | Fuel Saving Technology Areas | 
| 7.3.14. | Zero Emission Trucks: Drivers and Barriers | 
| 7.3.15. | Installed Battery Capacity by Truck Weight | 
| 7.3.16. | E-Truck OEM Battery Chemistry Choice | 
| 7.3.17. | Heavy-Duty Battery Choice: Range & Payload | 
| 7.3.18. | Battery Chemistry Tailored to Duty Requirement | 
| 7.3.19. | The EV revolution is happening on two wheels | 
| 7.3.20. | China and India are major three-wheeler markets | 
| 7.3.21. | Policies supporting two and three-wheelers | 
| 7.3.22. | Electrification is occurring faster in the three-wheeler markets | 
| 7.3.23. | Micro EV types | 
| 7.3.24. | European two-wheeler classification | 
| 7.3.25. | Micro EV characteristics | 
| 7.3.26. | Battery chemistry choices | 
| 7.3.27. | Lead-acid vs lithium-ion | 
| 7.3.28. | Battery cost of two-wheelers in China | 
| 7.3.29. | Lithium-ion two-wheelers on the rise | 
| 7.4. | Electric off-road (construction, material handling, marine) | 
| 7.4.1. | Drivers for Construction Vehicle Electrification | 
| 7.4.2. | Advantages of / Barriers to Machine Electrification | 
| 7.4.3. | Performance Advantages of an Electric Excavator | 
| 7.4.4. | Battery Sizes for Different Vehicle Types | 
| 7.4.5. | Options for Meeting Power Duty Cycle Power Demand | 
| 7.4.6. | Chinese OEMs Large Battery Excavators | 
| 7.4.7. | Battery Requirements in Construction: Performance | 
| 7.4.8. | Construction Equipment Electrification Opportunities (1) | 
| 7.4.9. | Construction Equipment Electrification Opportunities (2) | 
| 7.4.10. | Known construction & battery supplier relationships (1) | 
| 7.4.11. | Known construction & battery supplier relationships (2) | 
| 7.4.12. | Key performance indicators for train battery systems | 
| 7.4.13. | Battery Chemistry Benchmarking for Trains | 
| 7.4.14. | Operational Energy Demand for Battery Sizing | 
| 7.4.15. | Battery System Suppliers to Rail OEMs | 
| 7.4.16. | Toshiba LTO Battery Rail Projects & Market | 
| 7.4.17. | Forsee Power Target Light Rail Applications | 
| 7.4.18. | Rail Battery System Prices by Chemistry US$/kWh | 
| 7.4.19. | Intralogistics shifting to Li-ion | 
| 7.4.20. | Intralogistics Li-ion partnerships | 
| 7.4.21. | Li-ion intralogistics chemistries | 
| 7.4.22. | Summary of market drivers for electric & hybrid marine | 
| 7.4.23. | Overview of policy for maritime batteries | 
| 7.4.24. | Shifting Emission Policy Focus | 
| 7.4.25. | The importance of batteries in hybrid systems | 
| 7.4.26. | Why marine batteries are unique | 
| 7.4.27. | Marine systems: stacks & strings scaling to MWh | 
| 7.4.28. | Marine battery system specs | 
| 7.4.29. | Battery chemistries for marine applications | 
| 8. | FORECASTS | 
| 8.1. | Electric car Li-ion demand forecast (GWh) | 
| 8.2. | Electric bus, truck and van battery forecast (GWh) | 
| 8.3. | Micro EV Li-ion demand forecast (GWh) | 
| 8.4. | Global electric vehicle Li-ion demand (GWh) | 
| 8.5. | Li-ion forecast by cathode (GWh) | 
| 8.6. | Cell price forecast | 
| 8.7. | BEV car pack price | 
| 8.8. | Electric car Li-ion battery market forecast (US$B) | 
| 8.9. | On-road EV Li-ion battery market (US$B) | 
| 8.10. | EV Li-ion battery market (US$B) | 
| 8.11. | EV Li-ion battery market (US$B) |