| 1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | 
| 1.1. | Classifications of solid-state electrolytes | 
| 1.2. | Liquid vs. solid-state batteries | 
| 1.3. | Thin film vs. bulk solid-state batteries | 
| 1.4. | SSB company commercial plans | 
| 1.5. | Solid state battery collaborations / investment by Automotive OEMs | 
| 1.6. | Status and future of solid state battery business | 
| 1.7. | Resources considerations | 
| 1.8. | Analysis of different features of SSBs | 
| 1.9. | Location overview of major solid-state battery companies | 
| 1.10. | Solid-state battery partnerships | 
| 1.11. | Summary of solid-state electrolyte technology | 
| 1.12. | Comparison of solid-state electrolyte systems 1 | 
| 1.13. | Comparison of solid-state electrolyte systems 2 | 
| 1.14. | Current electrolyte challenges and possible solution | 
| 1.15. | Technology summary of various companies | 
| 1.16. | Solid-state battery value chain | 
| 1.17. | Market forecast methodology | 
| 1.18. | Assumptions and analysis of market forecast of SSB | 
| 1.19. | Price forecast of solid state battery for various applications | 
| 1.20. | Solid-state battery addressable market size | 
| 1.21. | Solid-state battery forecast 2023-2033 by application (GWh) | 
| 1.22. | Solid-state battery forecast 2023-2033 by application (market value) | 
| 1.23. | Solid-state battery forecast 2023-2033 by technology (GWh) | 
| 1.24. | Solid-state battery forecast 2023-2033 by technology (GWh) | 
| 1.25. | Market size segmentation in 2023 and 2028 | 
| 1.26. | Solid-state battery forecast 2023-2033 for car plug in | 
| 2. | INTRODUCTION TO SOLID-STATE BATTERIES | 
| 2.1. | What is a solid-state battery | 
| 2.1.1. | Introduction | 
| 2.1.2. | Classifications of solid-state electrolytes | 
| 2.1.3. | A solid future? | 
| 2.1.4. | History of solid-state batteries | 
| 2.1.5. | Milestone of solid-state battery development | 
| 2.1.6. | Solid-state electrolytes | 
| 2.1.7. | Requirements for solid-state electrolyte with multifunctions | 
| 2.2. | Interests and Activities on Solid-State Batteries | 
| 2.2.1. | How to design a good solid-state electrolyte | 
| 2.2.2. | Energy storage evolvement | 
| 2.2.3. | Solid-state battery publication dynamics | 
| 2.2.4. | Regional efforts: USA | 
| 2.2.5. | Regional efforts: Japan | 
| 2.2.6. | Regional efforts: South Korea | 
| 2.2.7. | Battery vendors' efforts - Samsung SDI | 
| 2.2.8. | Samsung's commercial efforts | 
| 2.2.9. | LG's contributions | 
| 2.2.10. | Regional efforts: China | 
| 2.2.11. | Interests in China | 
| 2.2.12. | 14 Other Chinese player activities on solid state batteries | 
| 2.2.13. | Chinese car player activities on solid-state batteries | 
| 2.2.14. | Regional efforts: UK | 
| 2.2.15. | Regional efforts: Others | 
| 2.2.16. | Automakers' efforts - BMW | 
| 2.2.17. | Mercedes-Benz's inhouse cell development | 
| 2.2.18. | Automakers' efforts - Volkswagen | 
| 2.2.19. | Volkswagen's investment in electric vehicle batteries | 
| 2.2.20. | Automakers' efforts - Hyundai | 
| 3. | SOLID-STATE BATTERIES, HOPE OR HYPE?—CONTROVERSIAL OPINIONS ON SOLID-STATE BATTERIES | 
| 3.1. | Introduction | 
| 3.1.1. | Value propositions of solid-state batteries | 
| 3.1.2. | Negative opinions on solid-state batteries | 
| 3.2. | Better Safety? | 
| 3.2.1. | Typical hypes of solid-state batteries | 
| 3.2.2. | Safety consideration | 
| 3.2.3. | Safety of liquid-electrolyte lithium-ion batteries | 
| 3.2.4. | Modern horror films are finding their scares in dead phone batteries | 
| 3.2.5. | Samsung's Firegate | 
| 3.2.6. | LIB cell temperature and likely outcome | 
| 3.2.7. | Safety aspects of Li-ion batteries | 
| 3.2.8. | Are solid-state battery safer? | 
| 3.2.9. | Conclusions of SSB safety | 
| 3.3. | Higher Energy Density? | 
| 3.3.1. | How do SSBs help with energy density | 
| 3.3.2. | Energy density improvement | 
| 3.3.3. | Solid state battery does not always lead to higher energy density | 
| 3.3.4. | Specific energy comparison of different electrolytes | 
| 3.3.5. | Alternative anode is required for high energy density | 
| 3.3.6. | Lithium metal anode | 
| 3.3.7. | Where is lithium? | 
| 3.3.8. | How to produce lithium | 
| 3.3.9. | Lithium hydroxide vs. lithium carbonate | 
| 3.3.10. | Lithium-metal battery approaches | 
| 3.3.11. | Failure story about metallic lithium anode | 
| 3.3.12. | Lithium metal challenge | 
| 3.3.13. | Dendrite formation: Current density | 
| 3.3.14. | Dendrite formation: Pressure and temperature | 
| 3.3.15. | Cycling preference for anode-free lithium metal cells | 
| 3.3.16. | Solid-state battery with lithium metal anode | 
| 3.3.17. | Lithium in solid-state batteries | 
| 3.3.18. | Lithium metal foils | 
| 3.3.19. | Silicon anode | 
| 3.3.20. | Introduction to silicon anode | 
| 3.3.21. | Value proposition of silicon anodes | 
| 3.3.22. | Comparison between graphite and silicon | 
| 3.3.23. | Solutions for silicon incorporation | 
| 3.3.24. | Silicon anode for solid-state electrolyte | 
| 3.3.25. | Conclusions of solid-state battery energy density | 
| 3.4. | Fast Charging? | 
| 3.4.1. | Fast charging at each stage | 
| 3.4.2. | The importance of battery feature for fast charging | 
| 3.4.3. | Fast charging for solid-state batteries | 
| 3.5. | Reality of Solid-State Batteries | 
| 3.5.1. | Analysis of different features of SSBs | 
| 4. | SOLID-STATE ELECTROLYTE | 
| 4.1. | Introduction | 
| 4.1.1. | Solid-state electrolyte landscape | 
| 4.2. | Solid Polymer Electrolyte | 
| 4.2.1. | LiPo batteries, polymer-based batteries, polymeric batteries | 
| 4.2.2. | Types of polymer electrolytes | 
| 4.2.3. | Electrolytic polymer options | 
| 4.2.4. | Advantages and issues of polymer electrolytes | 
| 4.2.5. | PEO for solid polymer electrolyte | 
| 4.2.6. | Companies working on polymer solid state batteries | 
| 4.3. | Solid Oxide Inorganic Electrolytes | 
| 4.3.1. | Oxide electrolyte | 
| 4.3.2. | Garnet | 
| 4.3.3. | Estimated cost projection for LLZO-based SSB | 
| 4.3.4. | NASICON-type | 
| 4.3.5. | Perovskite | 
| 4.3.6. | LiPON | 
| 4.3.7. | LiPON: construction | 
| 4.3.8. | Players worked and working LiPON-based batteries | 
| 4.3.9. | Cathode material options for LiPON-based batteries | 
| 4.3.10. | Anodes for LiPON-based batteries | 
| 4.3.11. | Substrate options for LiPON-based batteries | 
| 4.3.12. | Trend of materials and processes of thin-film battery in different companies | 
| 4.3.13. | LiPON: capacity increase | 
| 4.3.14. | Comparison of inorganic oxide solid-state electrolyte | 
| 4.3.15. | Thermal stability of oxide electrolyte with lithium metal | 
| 4.3.16. | Companies working on oxide solid state batteries | 
| 4.4. | Solid Sulfide Inorganic Electrolytes | 
| 4.4.1. | LISICON-type 1 | 
| 4.4.2. | LISICON-type 2 | 
| 4.4.3. | Argyrodite | 
| 4.4.4. | Companies working on sulphide solid state batteries | 
| 4.5. | Composite Electrolytes | 
| 4.5.1. | The best of both worlds? | 
| 4.5.2. | Common hybrid electrolyte concept | 
| 4.6. | Other Electrolytes | 
| 4.6.1. | Li-hydrides | 
| 4.6.2. | Li-halides | 
| 4.7. | Electrolyte analysis and comparison | 
| 4.7.1. | Technology evaluation | 
| 4.7.2. | Technology evaluation (continued) | 
| 4.7.3. | Types of solid inorganic electrolytes for Li-ion | 
| 4.7.4. | Advantages and issues with inorganic electrolytes 1 | 
| 4.7.5. | Advantages and issues with inorganic electrolytes 2 | 
| 4.7.6. | Advantages and issues with inorganic electrolytes 3 | 
| 4.7.7. | Dendrites prevention | 
| 4.7.8. | Comparison between inorganic and polymer electrolytes 1 | 
| 4.7.9. | Comparison between inorganic and polymer electrolytes 2 | 
| 5. | FROM CELLS DESIGN TO SYSTEM DESIGN FOR SOLID-STATE BATTERIES | 
| 5.1. | Solid-State Battery Cell Design | 
| 5.1.1. | Commercial battery form factors 1 | 
| 5.1.2. | Commercial battery form factors 2 | 
| 5.1.3. | Battery configurations 1 | 
| 5.1.4. | Battery configurations 2 | 
| 5.1.5. | Cell stacking options | 
| 5.1.6. | Bipolar cells | 
| 5.1.7. | ProLogium's bipolar design | 
| 5.1.8. | "Anode-free" batteries | 
| 5.1.9. | Challenges of anode free batteries | 
| 5.1.10. | Close stacking | 
| 5.1.11. | Flexibility and customisation provided by solid-state batteries | 
| 5.1.12. | Cell size trend | 
| 5.1.13. | Cell design ideas | 
| 5.2. | From Cell to Pack | 
| 5.2.1. | Pack parameters mean more than cell's | 
| 5.2.2. | The importance of a pack system | 
| 5.2.3. | Influence of the CTP design | 
| 5.2.4. | BYD's blade battery: overview | 
| 5.2.5. | BYD's blade battery: structure and composition | 
| 5.2.6. | BYD's blade battery: design | 
| 5.2.7. | BYD's blade battery: pack layout | 
| 5.2.8. | BYD's blade battery: energy density improvement | 
| 5.2.9. | BYD's blade battery: thermal safety | 
| 5.2.10. | BYD's blade battery: structural safety | 
| 5.2.11. | Cost and performance | 
| 5.2.12. | BYD's blade battery: what CTP indicates | 
| 5.2.13. | CATL's CTP design | 
| 5.2.14. | CATL's CTP battery evolution | 
| 5.2.15. | CATL's Qilin Battery | 
| 5.2.16. | From cell to pack for conventional Li-ions | 
| 5.2.17. | Solid-state batteries: From cell to pack | 
| 5.2.18. | Bipolar-enabled CTP | 
| 5.2.19. | Conventional design vs. bipolar cell design | 
| 5.2.20. | EV battery pack assembly | 
| 5.2.21. | ProLogium: "MAB" EV battery pack assembly | 
| 5.2.22. | MAB idea to increase assembly utilization | 
| 5.2.23. | Solid-state battery: Competing at pack level | 
| 5.2.24. | Business models between battery-auto companies | 
| 5.3. | Battery Management System for Solid-State Batteries | 
| 5.3.1. | The importance of a battery management system | 
| 5.3.2. | Functions of a BMS | 
| 5.3.3. | BMS subsystems | 
| 5.3.4. | Cell control | 
| 5.3.5. | Cooling technology comparison | 
| 5.3.6. | BMS designs with different geometries | 
| 5.3.7. | Qilin Battery's thermal management system | 
| 5.3.8. | Thermal conductivity of the cells | 
| 5.3.9. | Cell connection | 
| 5.3.10. | BMS design considerations for SSBs | 
| 6. | SOLID-STATE BATTERY MANUFACTURING | 
| 6.1. | Timeline for mass production | 
| 6.2. | Conventional Li-ion battery cell production process | 
| 6.3. | The incumbent process: lamination | 
| 6.4. | Conventional Li-ion battery manufacturing conditions | 
| 6.5. | General manufacturing differences between conventional Li-ion and SSBs | 
| 6.6. | Process chains for solid electrolyte fabrication | 
| 6.7. | Process chains for anode fabrication | 
| 6.8. | Process chains for cathode fabrication | 
| 6.9. | Process chains for cell assembly | 
| 6.10. | Exemplary manufacturing processes | 
| 6.11. | Possible processing routes of solid-state battery components fabrication | 
| 6.12. | Are mass production coming? | 
| 6.13. | Pouch cells | 
| 6.14. | Techniques to fabricate aluminium laminated sheets | 
| 6.15. | Packaging procedures for pouch cells 1 | 
| 6.16. | Packaging procedures for pouch cells 2 | 
| 6.17. | Oxide electrolyte thickness and processing temperatures | 
| 6.18. | Solid battery fabrication process | 
| 6.19. | Manufacturing equipment for solid-state batteries | 
| 6.20. | Industrial-scale fabrication of Li metal polymer batteries | 
| 6.21. | Are thin film electrolytes viable? | 
| 6.22. | Summary of main fabrication technique for thin film batteries | 
| 6.23. | Wet-chemical & vacuum-based deposition methods for Li-oxide thin films | 
| 6.24. | Current processing methods and challenges for mass manufacturing of Li-oxide thin-film materials | 
| 6.25. | PVD processes for thin-film batteries 1 | 
| 6.26. | PVD processes for thin-film batteries 2 | 
| 6.27. | PVD processes for thin-film batteries 3 | 
| 6.28. | Ilika's PVD approach | 
| 6.29. | Avenues for manufacturing | 
| 6.30. | Toyota's approach 1 | 
| 6.31. | Toyota's approach 2 | 
| 6.32. | Hitachi Zosen's approach | 
| 6.33. | Sakti3's PVD approach | 
| 6.34. | Planar Energy's approach | 
| 6.35. | Typical manufacturing method of the all solid-state battery (SMD type) | 
| 6.36. | ProLogium's LCB manufacturing processes | 
| 6.37. | ProLogium's manufacturing processes | 
| 6.38. | Solid Power: Fabrication of cathode and electrolyte | 
| 6.39. | Solid Power cell production | 
| 6.40. | Pilot production facility of Solid Power | 
| 6.41. | Qingtao's manufacturing processes | 
| 6.42. | Yichun 1GWh facility equipment and capacity | 
| 6.43. | Introduction to dry electrode manufacturing | 
| 6.44. | Dry battery electrode fabrication | 
| 6.45. | Dry electrode binders | 
| 6.46. | Comparison between wet slurry and dry electrode processes | 
| 7. | SOLID-STATE BATTERIES BEYOND LI-ION | 
| 7.1. | Solid-state electrolytes in lithium-sulphur batteries | 
| 7.2. | Lithium sulphur solid electrode development phases | 
| 7.3. | Solid-state electrolytes in lithium-air batteries | 
| 7.4. | Solid-state electrolytes in metal-air batteries | 
| 7.5. | Solid-state electrolytes in sodium-ion batteries 1 | 
| 7.6. | Solid-state electrolytes in sodium-ion batteries 2 | 
| 7.7. | Solid-state electrolytes in sodium-sulphur batteries 1 | 
| 7.8. | Solid-state electrolytes in sodium-sulphur batteries 2 | 
| 8. | RECYCLING | 
| 8.1. | Global policy summary on Li-ion battery recycling | 
| 8.2. | Battery geometry for recycling | 
| 8.3. | Lack of pack standardisation | 
| 8.4. | LIB recycling approaches overview | 
| 8.5. | Recycling categories | 
| 8.6. | Recycling of SSBs | 
| 8.7. | Recycling plan of ProLogium | 
| 9. | POLICIES, REGULATIONS AND GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT | 
| 9.1. | Introduction | 
| 9.1.1. | Roadmap for battery cell technology | 
| 9.1.2. | Technology roadmap according to Germany's NPE | 
| 9.1.3. | Worldwide battery target roadmap | 
| 9.1.4. | Solid-state battery roadmap to 2035 | 
| 9.1.5. | Material to cell roadmap | 
| 9.1.6. | Cell to application roadmap | 
| 9.1.7. | Global electrification commitments | 
| 9.1.8. | Factors affecting the European market 1 | 
| 9.1.9. | Factors affecting the European market 2 | 
| 9.1.10. | Factors affecting the European market 3 | 
| 9.2. | Standards/Policies/Regulations for Automotive Applications | 
| 9.2.1. | Global environment | 
| 9.2.2. | Standardisation and legislative framework | 
| 9.2.3. | Global Standardization and Regulation | 
| 9.2.4. | International Organizations | 
| 9.2.5. | Relevant National Organizations | 
| 9.2.6. | UN 38.3 | 
| 9.2.7. | IEC - 61960 | 
| 9.2.8. | IEC 61960 - 3 &4 | 
| 9.2.9. | SAE J2464 | 
| 9.2.10. | UL 1642 | 
| 9.2.11. | UL 1642 - Further information: Scope of the Test | 
| 9.2.12. | EUCAR and the Hazard Level | 
| 9.2.13. | Common safety verification | 
| 10. | SOLID-STATE BATTERY APPLICATIONS | 
| 10.1. | Potential applications for solid-state batteries | 
| 10.2. | Market readiness | 
| 10.3. | Market readiness 2 | 
| 10.4. | Market readiness 3 | 
| 10.5. | Solid-state batteries for consumer electronics | 
| 10.6. | Performance comparison: CEs & wearables | 
| 10.7. | Batteries used in electric vehicles: example | 
| 10.8. | Solid-state batteries for electric vehicles | 
| 11. | COMPANY PROFILES | 
| 11.1. | 24M | 
| 11.1.1. | Company summary | 
| 11.1.2. | Performance summary of 24M | 
| 11.1.3. | 24M's cell configuration | 
| 11.1.4. | History of 24M | 
| 11.1.5. | History of 24M (2) | 
| 11.1.6. | 24M's technology | 
| 11.1.7. | Partnership history and target specifications | 
| 11.1.8. | Manufacturing comparison | 
| 11.1.9. | Streamlined production process vs. conventional solutions | 
| 11.1.10. | Time saving of 24M technology | 
| 11.1.11. | FREYR battery manufacturing development roadmap based on 24M's technology | 
| 11.1.12. | Processes of manufacturing semi-solid cells | 
| 11.1.13. | New platform enabled by 24M | 
| 11.1.14. | Redefining manufacturing process by 24M | 
| 11.1.15. | 24M's semi-automated pilot manufacturing line | 
| 11.1.16. | Kyocera's commercial activities | 
| 11.1.17. | 24M Dual Electrolyte System | 
| 11.1.18. | Dual Electrolyte System proof of concept | 
| 11.1.19. | Dual electrolyte enabling Li-metal: NMC622/SSE, 45 µm /lithium metal | 
| 11.1.20. | Lithium coated copper foil for pre-lithiation | 
| 11.1.21. | 24M commercial partners and investors | 
| 11.1.22. | 24M's business model and funding | 
| 11.1.23. | 24M product roadmap | 
| 11.1.24. | FREYR's battery supply chain | 
| 11.1.25. | Value chain of Freyr by using 24M technology | 
| 11.1.26. | Emerging European battery supply chain facilitates full-cycle sustainability | 
| 11.1.27. | 24M supply chain | 
| 11.1.28. | Carbon reduction analysis | 
| 11.1.29. | Battery cost breakdown by Freyr | 
| 11.1.30. | Patent descriptions of 24M | 
| 11.1.31. | SWOT analysis of 24M | 
| 11.1.32. | Technology analysis | 
| 11.1.33. | Technology analysis (2) | 
| 11.1.34. | Manufacturing and supply chain analysis | 
| 11.1.35. | Relationship and business analysis | 
| 11.2. | Ampcera | 
| 11.2.1. | Company introduction | 
| 11.2.2. | Ampcera's technology | 
| 11.2.3. | Solid-state composite | 
| 11.2.4. | Products | 
| 11.2.5. | Key customers and partners | 
| 11.3. | Blue Solutions / Bolloré | 
| 11.3.1. | Introduction to Blue Solutions | 
| 11.3.2. | Bolloré's LMF batteries | 
| 11.3.3. | Automakers' efforts - Bolloré | 
| 11.3.4. | Blue Solutions' technology development | 
| 11.4. | BrightVolt | 
| 11.4.1. | BrightVolt batteries | 
| 11.4.2. | BrightVolt electrolyte | 
| 11.4.3. | PME enabled simplified back-end assembly | 
| 11.4.4. | Battery testing data | 
| 11.4.5. | Cell scaling | 
| 11.4.6. | Manufacturing compatibility | 
| 11.5. | CATL | 
| 11.5.1. | Introduction | 
| 11.5.2. | CATL's energy density development roadmap | 
| 11.5.3. | CATL's patents on solid-state batteries | 
| 11.6. | CEA Tech | 
| 11.7. | Coslight | 
| 11.8. | Cymbet Corporation | 
| 11.8.1. | Introduction to Cymbet | 
| 11.8.2. | Technology | 
| 11.8.3. | Micro-battery products | 
| 11.9. | Enovate Motors | 
| 11.10. | Ensurge Micropower (Formerly Thin Film Electronics ASA ) | 
| 11.10.1. | Introduction to the company | 
| 11.10.2. | Ensurge's execution plan | 
| 11.10.3. | Ensurge's technology 1 | 
| 11.10.4. | Ensurge's technology 2 | 
| 11.10.5. | Anode-less design | 
| 11.10.6. | Business model and market | 
| 11.10.7. | Key customers, partners, and competitors | 
| 11.10.8. | Company financials | 
| 11.11. | Excellatron | 
| 11.11.1. | Introduction to Excellatron | 
| 11.11.2. | Thin-film solid-state batteries made by Excellatron | 
| 11.12. | Factorial Energy | 
| 11.12.1. | Company summary | 
| 11.12.2. | Performance summary of Factorial Energy | 
| 11.12.3. | Introduction to Factorial Energy | 
| 11.12.4. | Company history | 
| 11.12.5. | Factorial Energy's technology | 
| 11.12.6. | Cycle life tests | 
| 11.12.7. | Elevated  and low temperature tests | 
| 11.12.8. | Power test | 
| 11.12.9. | Possible supply chain | 
| 11.12.10. | SWOT analysis of Factorial Energy | 
| 11.12.11. | Technology analysis | 
| 11.12.12. | Technology analysis 2 | 
| 11.12.13. | Business analysis | 
| 11.13. | FDK | 
| 11.13.1. | Introduction | 
| 11.13.2. | Applications of FDK's solid state battery | 
| 11.13.3. | FDK's SMD all-solid-state battery | 
| 11.14. | Fisker | 
| 11.14.1. | Automakers' efforts - Fisker Inc. | 
| 11.15. | Fraunhofer | 
| 11.15.1. | Academic views - Fraunhofer Batterien | 
| 11.15.2. | IKTS' sites working on ASSB | 
| 11.15.3. | IKTS' technology | 
| 11.15.4. | LLZO manufacturing processes | 
| 11.15.5. | IKTS' EMBATT development | 
| 11.15.6. | Work on LATP | 
| 11.16. | Front Edge Technology | 
| 11.16.1. | Ultra-thin micro-battery - NanoEnergy® (1) | 
| 11.16.2. | Ultra-thin micro-battery - NanoEnergy® (2) | 
| 11.17. | Ganfeng Lithium | 
| 11.17.1. | Company summary | 
| 11.17.2. | Performance summary of Ganfeng Lithium | 
| 11.17.3. | Cell structure summary | 
| 11.17.4. | Ganfeng Lithium's history (1) | 
| 11.17.5. | Ganfeng Lithium's history (2) | 
| 11.17.6. | Ganfeng Lithium's history (3) | 
| 11.17.7. | Dongfeng demonstration | 
| 11.17.8. | Ganfeng Lithium's SSB technology | 
| 11.17.9. | Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology & Engineering, CAS | 
| 11.17.10. | Pilot produced battery: energy density | 
| 11.17.11. | Pilot produced battery: rating capability | 
| 11.17.12. | Pilot produced battery: temperature performance | 
| 11.17.13. | Ganfeng's collaborative ecosystem | 
| 11.17.14. | Global layout | 
| 11.17.15. | Ganfeng's supply chain layout | 
| 11.17.16. | R&D laboratory | 
| 11.17.17. | Scientific research platform | 
| 11.17.18. | Undertaken projects | 
| 11.17.19. | Collaboration | 
| 11.17.20. | Lithium metal production | 
| 11.17.21. | Technology roadmap | 
| 11.17.22. | Solid-state battery products: Solid-state lithium-ion battery | 
| 11.17.23. | Solid-state battery products: Solid-State lithium metal cell | 
| 11.17.24. | Solid-state battery products: Solid-state lithium battery module | 
| 11.17.25. | Gangfeng Lithium's supply chain | 
| 11.17.26. | Funding and clients | 
| 11.17.27. | Financial details of 2020 | 
| 11.17.28. | Revenue by business lines | 
| 11.17.29. | Revenue by geography | 
| 11.17.30. | Revenue / profit over years | 
| 11.17.31. | SWOT analysis of Ganfeng Lithium | 
| 11.17.32. | Technology and manufacturing analysis | 
| 11.17.33. | Supply chain analysis | 
| 11.17.34. | Relationship and business analysis | 
| 11.18. | Hitachi Zosen | 
| 11.18.1. | Hitachi Zosen's solid-state electrolyte | 
| 11.18.2. | Hitachi Zosen's batteries | 
| 11.18.3. | Battery characteristics | 
| 11.19. | Hydro-Québec | 
| 11.19.1. | Hydro-Québec 1 | 
| 11.19.2. | Hydro-Québec 2 | 
| 11.19.3. | Battery development plan | 
| 11.19.4. | Partners | 
| 11.20. | Ilika | 
| 11.20.1. | Introduction to Ilika | 
| 11.20.2. | Ilika's microtechnology | 
| 11.20.3. | Technology roadmap and potential applications | 
| 11.20.4. | Ilika's business model | 
| 11.20.5. | Ilika's manufacturing model | 
| 11.20.6. | Ilika: Stereax | 
| 11.20.7. | Ilika: Goliath | 
| 11.20.8. | Goliath manufacturing | 
| 11.21. | Infinite Power Solutions | 
| 11.21.1. | Technology of Infinite Power Solutions | 
| 11.21.2. | Cost comparison between a standard prismatic battery and IPS' battery | 
| 11.22. | Ionic Materials | 
| 11.22.1. | Introduction | 
| 11.22.2. | Technology and manufacturing process of Ionic Materials | 
| 11.23. | Ion Storage Systems | 
| 11.23.1. | Introduction to Ion Storage Systems | 
| 11.23.2. | Cell technology | 
| 11.23.3. | Ion Storage System's scaling process | 
| 11.23.4. | Partners and expertise | 
| 11.24. | JiaWei Renewable Energy | 
| 11.25. | Johnson Energy Storage | 
| 11.25.1. | JES' technology | 
| 11.26. | Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology & Engineering, CAS | 
| 11.27. | Ohara Corporation | 
| 11.27.1. | Lithium ion conducting glass-ceramic powder-01 | 
| 11.27.2. | LICGCTM PW-01 for cathode additives | 
| 11.27.3. | Ohara's products for solid state batteries | 
| 11.27.4. | Ohara / PolyPlus | 
| 11.27.5. | Application of LICGC for all solid state batteries | 
| 11.27.6. | Properties of multilayer all solid-state lithium ion battery using LICGC as electrolyte | 
| 11.27.7. | LICGC products at the show | 
| 11.27.8. | Manufacturing process of Ohara glass | 
| 11.28. | PolyPlus | 
| 11.28.1. | Introduction to PolyPlus | 
| 11.28.2. | PLE separator | 
| 11.28.3. | PolyPlus projects | 
| 11.28.4. | PLE-based batteries | 
| 11.28.5. | Lithium seawater battery development plan | 
| 11.28.6. | PolyPlus Glass Battery | 
| 11.28.7. | Testing data | 
| 11.28.8. | Cell fabrication | 
| 11.28.9. | Hybrid Li-metal battery vs fully solid-state battery | 
| 11.29. | Prieto Battery | 
| 11.30. | Prime Planet Energy & Solutions | 
| 11.30.1. | Company introduction | 
| 11.31. | ProLogium | 
| 11.31.1. | Company summary | 
| 11.31.2. | Performance summary of ProLogium | 
| 11.31.3. | Cell structure summary | 
| 11.31.4. | Separator description | 
| 11.31.5. | Company history | 
| 11.31.6. | Funding | 
| 11.31.7. | Technology highlights | 
| 11.31.8. | Core technology: oxide electrolyte & ASM | 
| 11.31.9. | Core technology: LCB | 
| 11.31.10. | Core technology: MAB | 
| 11.31.11. | Product types | 
| 11.31.12. | Improvement of LCB electrical properties | 
| 11.31.13. | Improvement of LCB cells | 
| 11.31.14. | Cell operation temperature data | 
| 11.31.15. | MAB pack progress roadmap | 
| 11.31.16. | MAB idea to increase assembly utilization | 
| 11.31.17. | ProLogium assembly CTP and CIP | 
| 11.31.18. | Inlay structure for the MAB technology | 
| 11.31.19. | ProLogium: EV battery pack assembly | 
| 11.31.20. | ProLogium: "MAB" EV battery pack assembly | 
| 11.31.21. | Cost reduction potential | 
| 11.31.22. | ProLogium's manufacturing experience | 
| 11.31.23. | Global production plan | 
| 11.31.24. | Recycling | 
| 11.31.25. | Business model and markets | 
| 11.31.26. | Supply chain of ProLogium | 
| 11.31.27. | Patent summary | 
| 11.31.28. | Adoption case study: Enovate Motors | 
| 11.31.29. | SWOT analysis of ProLogium | 
| 11.31.30. | Cell technology strengths | 
| 11.31.31. | Cell technology weaknesses | 
| 11.31.32. | Pack technology analysis | 
| 11.31.33. | Manufacturing analysis | 
| 11.31.34. | Supply chain analysis | 
| 11.31.35. | Business analysis | 
| 11.32. | Qingtao Energy Development | 
| 11.32.1. | Company summary | 
| 11.32.2. | Performance summary of Qingtao | 
| 11.32.3. | Cell structure summary | 
| 11.32.4. | History of Qingtao Energy Development 1 | 
| 11.32.5. | History of Qingtao Energy Development 2 | 
| 11.32.6. | History of QingTao Energy Development 3 | 
| 11.32.7. | Mass specific energy test | 
| 11.32.8. | Qingtao business areas | 
| 11.32.9. | Yichun 1GWh facility equipment and capacity | 
| 11.32.10. | Manufacturing processes | 
| 11.32.11. | Yichun 1GWh facility: major materials | 
| 11.32.12. | Yichun 1GWh facility: major materials (continue) | 
| 11.32.13. | Cell manufacturing | 
| 11.32.14. | Qingtao battery pilot sample production facilities | 
| 11.32.15. | Qingtao material formation/process R&D platform 1 | 
| 11.32.16. | Qingtao material formation/process R&D platform 2 | 
| 11.32.17. | Qingtao 1GWh facility | 
| 11.32.18. | Qingtao's SSB products: Cells | 
| 11.32.19. | Qingtao's SSB products: Packs 1 | 
| 11.32.20. | Qingtao's SSB products: Packs 2 | 
| 11.32.21. | Qingtao's SSB products: Electronics | 
| 11.32.22. | Qingtao's SSB products: Energy storage systems | 
| 11.32.23. | Qingtao's SSB products: Materials | 
| 11.32.24. | Qingtao's solid-state battery supply chain | 
| 11.32.25. | Funding | 
| 11.32.26. | Board members | 
| 11.32.27. | Commercialization plan of Qingtao | 
| 11.32.28. | BAIC's prototype | 
| 11.32.29. | Hozon Automobile's prototype | 
| 11.32.30. | SWOT analysis of Qingtao | 
| 11.32.31. | Analysis factors | 
| 11.32.32. | Cell performance analysis | 
| 11.32.33. | Manufacturing and supply chain analysis | 
| 11.32.34. | Relationship and business analysis | 
| 11.33. | QuantumScape | 
| 11.33.1. | Company summary | 
| 11.33.2. | Performance summary of QuantumScape | 
| 11.33.3. | Cell structure summary | 
| 11.33.4. | Introduction to QuantumScape | 
| 11.33.5. | Introduction to QuantumScape's technology | 
| 11.33.6. | QuantumScape prototypes | 
| 11.33.7. | QuantumScape's technology | 
| 11.33.8. | Garnet electrolyte/catholyte | 
| 11.33.9. | Summary of test analysis of QuantumScape's cells | 
| 11.33.10. | Single layer battery cycle life test | 
| 11.33.11. | Low temperature life test | 
| 11.33.12. | 4-layer battery cycle life test | 
| 11.33.13. | 10-layer battery cycle life test | 
| 11.33.14. | Cycle life test for LFP batteries | 
| 11.33.15. | Fast charging test | 
| 11.33.16. | Dendrite resistance performance of the electrolyte | 
| 11.33.17. | Power profile tested by VW | 
| 11.33.18. | 4C fast charging | 
| 11.33.19. | Low temperature test | 
| 11.33.20. | Thermal stability test | 
| 11.33.21. | Heath checks | 
| 11.33.22. | Cycle life test | 
| 11.33.23. | Cycle life test (continued) | 
| 11.33.24. | Cycle life test (continued) | 
| 11.33.25. | Summary of external cycle life test | 
| 11.33.26. | Summary of cycle life test | 
| 11.33.27. | Zero externally applied pressure cycle life | 
| 11.33.28. | QuantumScape patent summary 1 | 
| 11.33.29. | QuantumScape patent summary 2 | 
| 11.33.30. | QuantumScape patent analysis 1 | 
| 11.33.31. | QuantumScape patent analysis 2 | 
| 11.33.32. | QuantumScape patent analysis 3 | 
| 11.33.33. | QuantumScape patent analysis 4 | 
| 11.33.34. | QuantumScape patent analysis 5 | 
| 11.33.35. | QuantumScape patent analysis 6 | 
| 11.33.36. | QuantumScape patent analysis 7 | 
| 11.33.37. | QuantumScape patent analysis 8 | 
| 11.33.38. | QuantumScape patent analysis 9 | 
| 11.33.39. | QuantumScape's manufacturing timeline | 
| 11.33.40. | Key milestones | 
| 11.33.41. | Manufacturing | 
| 11.33.42. | Key members in QuantumScape | 
| 11.33.43. | Solid-state battery supply chain of QuantumScape | 
| 11.33.44. | Funding and investors | 
| 11.33.45. | SWOT analysis of QuantumScape | 
| 11.33.46. | Features of garnet electrolyte in SSBs | 
| 11.33.47. | Technology analysis: Strengths | 
| 11.33.48. | Technology analysis: Weaknesses | 
| 11.33.49. | Manufacturing and supply chain analysis | 
| 11.33.50. | Relationship and business analysis | 
| 11.34. | Schott | 
| 11.35. | SEEO | 
| 11.36. | SES | 
| 11.36.1. | Company summary | 
| 11.36.2. | Performance summary of SES | 
| 11.36.3. | Cell structure summary | 
| 11.36.4. | Company history 1 | 
| 11.36.5. | Company history 2 | 
| 11.36.6. | 5 metrics of SES' technology | 
| 11.36.7. | SES technology | 
| 11.36.8. | Good lithium metal surface required | 
| 11.36.9. | SES' electrolyte | 
| 11.36.10. | SES electrolyte development roadmap for EV under C/3-C/3 | 
| 11.36.11. | SES electrolyte development | 
| 11.36.12. | SES technology to prevent dendrite growth | 
| 11.36.13. | SES technology to prevent dendrite growth (cont'd) | 
| 11.36.14. | AI powered BMS safety algorithm | 
| 11.36.15. | Cathode and cell assembly | 
| 11.36.16. | Cell test data: 3-4 layers cell cycle life | 
| 11.36.17. | Cell test data: 4Ah cell cycle life | 
| 11.36.18. | Cell test data: 4Ah cell c-rate capability | 
| 11.36.19. | Test data of Hermes cell | 
| 11.36.20. | Apollo cell | 
| 11.36.21. | Lithium metal foils | 
| 11.36.22. | SES' demonstrated cell performance | 
| 11.36.23. | Comparison of SES cell and old Li-metal cell, graphite-based Li-ion cell and Li-ion cell with silicon-graphite composite anode | 
| 11.36.24. | Comparison among conventional Li-ion, solid-state Li-metal and SES hybrid Li-metal cells | 
| 11.36.25. | SES' products | 
| 11.36.26. | SES's lithium metal cell data | 
| 11.36.27. | SES' view on the market | 
| 11.36.28. | SES patents | 
| 11.36.29. | Development of an OEM-ready battery | 
| 11.36.30. | Manufacturing facility plan | 
| 11.36.31. | SES roadmap | 
| 11.36.32. | Battery supply chain for SES | 
| 11.36.33. | The future of Li-metal / Li-ion supply chain | 
| 11.36.34. | Customers & partners & investors | 
| 11.36.35. | Partnership with GM, Hyundai, and Honda | 
| 11.36.36. | Funding and financials | 
| 11.36.37. | 2021 merge transaction summary | 
| 11.36.38. | SES board members | 
| 11.36.39. | SWOT analysis of SES | 
| 11.36.40. | Cell technology strengths | 
| 11.36.41. | Cell technology weaknesses | 
| 11.36.42. | Manufacturing and supply chain analysis | 
| 11.36.43. | Relationship and business analysis | 
| 11.37. | Solid Power | 
| 11.37.1. | Company summary | 
| 11.37.2. | Cell specifications | 
| 11.37.3. | Solid Power cell configuration | 
| 11.37.4. | History 1 | 
| 11.37.5. | History 2 | 
| 11.37.6. | Breaking energy density limit of Li-ion batteries | 
| 11.37.7. | Solid Power's core technology | 
| 11.37.8. | Solid Power's focus in the value chain | 
| 11.37.9. | Company products | 
| 11.37.10. | Solid Power's sulphide solid-state electrolyte | 
| 11.37.11. | Solid Power test data | 
| 11.37.12. | Solid Power test data (cont'd) | 
| 11.37.13. | High-content silicon EV cell data | 
| 11.37.14. | High-content silicon EV cell data (cont'd) | 
| 11.37.15. | High-content silicon EV cell data (cont'd) | 
| 11.37.16. | 0.2+ Ah pouch cell data (cont'd) | 
| 11.37.17. | Technologies on Solid Power product roadmap | 
| 11.37.18. | Solid Power's technology roadmap | 
| 11.37.19. | High-content silicon anode battery roadmap | 
| 11.37.20. | Lithium metal anode battery roadmap | 
| 11.37.21. | Product roadmap | 
| 11.37.22. | Solid Power's cell roadmap | 
| 11.37.23. | Prototype progress | 
| 11.37.24. | Solid Power showed their samples | 
| 11.37.25. | Commercialization roadmap | 
| 11.37.26. | Solid Power's business model | 
| 11.37.27. | Solid state battery supply chain of Solid Power | 
| 11.37.28. | Solid Power's ASSB technology & partner ecosystem | 
| 11.37.29. | Solid Power's flexible All-Solid-State Platform | 
| 11.37.30. | Solid Power cost estimate | 
| 11.37.31. | Defined path for cost reduction | 
| 11.37.32. | Fabrication of cathode and electrolyte | 
| 11.37.33. | Solid Power cell production | 
| 11.37.34. | Pilot production facility | 
| 11.37.35. | Management team | 
| 11.37.36. | Upcoming milestones | 
| 11.37.37. | Funding | 
| 11.37.38. | Key partners & investors | 
| 11.37.39. | Solid Power patents | 
| 11.37.40. | SWOT analysis of Solid Power | 
| 11.37.41. | Technology analysis: Strengths | 
| 11.37.42. | Technology analysis: Weaknesses | 
| 11.37.43. | Manufacturing and supply chain analysis | 
| 11.37.44. | Relationship and business analysis | 
| 11.38. | SOLiTHOR/Imec | 
| 11.38.1. | About imec | 
| 11.38.2. | Imec's electrolyte | 
| 11.38.3. | About SOLiTHOR | 
| 11.38.4. | SOLiTHOR's technology | 
| 11.39. | Solvay | 
| 11.39.1. | Solvay 1 | 
| 11.39.2. | Solvay 2 | 
| 11.40. | STMicroelectronics | 
| 11.41. | Taiyo Yuden | 
| 11.41.1. | Introduction | 
| 11.41.2. | Battery characteristics | 
| 11.41.3. | Pulse discharge performance | 
| 11.41.4. | Available products | 
| 11.42. | TDK | 
| 11.42.1. | Introduction | 
| 11.42.2. | CeraCharge's performance | 
| 11.42.3. | Main applications of CeraCharge | 
| 11.43. | Toshiba | 
| 11.43.1. | Introduction | 
| 11.43.2. | Composite solid-state electrolyte | 
| 11.44. | Toyota | 
| 11.44.1. | Toyota's activities | 
| 11.44.2. | Toyota's efforts | 
| 11.44.3. | Toyota's prototype | 
| 11.45. | WeLion New Energy Technology | 
| 11.45.1. | Company summary | 
| 11.45.2. | Performance summary of WeLion | 
| 11.45.3. | Cell configuration summary | 
| 11.45.4. | Company history | 
| 11.45.5. | NIO | 
| 11.45.6. | Progress of SSB research at IoP, CAS | 
| 11.45.7. | WeLion's battery development history | 
| 11.45.8. | Company presence | 
| 11.45.9. | Funding | 
| 11.45.10. | WeLion's core technologies 1 | 
| 11.45.11. | WeLion's core technologies 2 | 
| 11.45.12. | Core technology 1: Composite lithium anode: target rating and volume expansion issues | 
| 11.45.13. | Core technology 2: Ionic conducting film | 
| 11.45.14. | Core technology 3: In-situ solidification technology | 
| 11.45.15. | SEM images of the lithium metal and electrolyte | 
| 11.45.16. | Capacity / voltage performance of the battery | 
| 11.45.17. | Pre-lithiation | 
| 11.45.18. | WeLion products | 
| 11.45.19. | Products and application for EV | 
| 11.45.20. | Hybrid liquid-solid battery performance | 
| 11.45.21. | High energy density product performance | 
| 11.45.22. | Possible value chain for WeLion | 
| 11.45.23. | SWOT analysis of WeLion | 
| 11.45.24. | Technology analysis | 
| 11.45.25. | Supply chain, relationship and business analysis | 
| 12. | APPENDIX | 
| 12.1. | Appendix: Background | 
| 12.1.1. | Glossary of terms - specifications | 
| 12.1.2. | Useful charts for performance comparison | 
| 12.1.3. | Battery categories | 
| 12.1.4. | Comparison of commercial battery packaging technologies | 
| 12.1.5. | Actors along the value chain for energy storage | 
| 12.1.6. | Primary battery chemistries and common applications | 
| 12.1.7. | Numerical specifications of popular rechargeable battery chemistries | 
| 12.1.8. | Battery technology benchmark | 
| 12.1.9. | What does 1 kilowatthour (kWh) look like? | 
| 12.1.10. | A-D sample definitions | 
| 12.1.11. | Technology and manufacturing readiness | 
| 12.2. | Appendix: Li-Ion Batteries | 
| 12.2.1. | Food is electricity for humans | 
| 12.2.2. | What is a Li-ion battery (LIB)? | 
| 12.2.3. | Anode alternatives: Lithium titanium and lithium metal | 
| 12.2.4. | Anode alternatives: Other carbon materials | 
| 12.2.5. | Anode alternatives: Silicon, tin and alloying materials | 
| 12.2.6. | Cathode alternatives: LCO & LFP | 
| 12.2.7. | Cathode alternatives: NMC, NCA & LMO | 
| 12.2.8. | Cathode alternatives: LNMO and Vanadium pentoxide | 
| 12.2.9. | Cathode alternatives: Sulphur | 
| 12.2.10. | Cathode alternatives: Oxygen | 
| 12.2.11. | High energy cathodes require fluorinated electrolytes | 
| 12.2.12. | How can LIBs be improved? | 
| 12.2.13. | Milestone discoveries that shaped the modern lithium-ion batteries | 
| 12.2.14. | Push, pull and trilemma in Li-ions | 
| 12.2.15. | Lithium-ion supply chain | 
| 12.2.16. | High-end commercial Li-ion battery specifications | 
| 12.2.17. | Cathode performance comparison | 
| 12.2.18. | Comparison of Li-ion batteries for automotive | 
| 12.2.19. | Cell energy density comparison of different cathodes | 
| 12.3. | Appendix:Why Is Battery Development so Slow? | 
| 12.3.1. | What is a battery? | 
| 12.3.2. | A big obstacle — energy density | 
| 12.3.3. | Battery technology is based on redox reactions | 
| 12.3.4. | Electrochemical reaction is essentially based on electron transfer | 
| 12.3.5. | Electrochemical inactive components reduce energy density | 
| 12.3.6. | The importance of an electrolyte in a battery | 
| 12.3.7. | Cathode & anode need to have structural order | 
| 12.3.8. | Failure story about metallic lithium anode | 
| 12.3.9. | Appendix: Cathode and Cell Comparison for Conventional Lithium-Ion Batteries | 
| 12.3.10. | Cathode performance comparison | 
| 12.3.11. | Comparison of Li-ion batteries for automotive | 
| 12.3.12. | Cell energy density comparison of different cathodes |